Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bypass overload manager for stats and ready listeners #5321

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rudrakhp
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?
Fix: bypass overload manager for stats and ready listeners

What this PR does / why we need it:

Related #5260

@rudrakhp rudrakhp requested a review from a team as a code owner February 20, 2025 19:28
@rudrakhp rudrakhp force-pushed the bypass_om_stats_ready branch from 2debb21 to d8422af Compare February 20, 2025 19:30
@arkodg
Copy link
Contributor

arkodg commented Feb 20, 2025

that was quick 😄

@rudrakhp rudrakhp force-pushed the bypass_om_stats_ready branch from d8422af to 651b774 Compare February 20, 2025 19:39
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 20, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 64.94%. Comparing base (5934d1b) to head (8b1fc75).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5321      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   64.92%   64.94%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         213      213              
  Lines       33454    33455       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits        21719    21728       +9     
+ Misses      10404    10399       -5     
+ Partials     1331     1328       -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@guydc
Copy link
Contributor

guydc commented Feb 20, 2025

LGTM, maybe just a release note under "behavior changes". IMHO, this is the correct default behavior, but maybe some folks assume that OM fails checks so that the pods are excluded from the serving set by kube-proxy/externalLB, ...

arkodg
arkodg previously approved these changes Feb 20, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@arkodg arkodg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM thanks !

@arkodg arkodg requested review from a team February 20, 2025 20:16
@zirain
Copy link
Member

zirain commented Feb 20, 2025

need changelog

Signed-off-by: Rudrakh Panigrahi <rudrakh97@gmail.com>
@rudrakhp
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants