Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Try fix test for PR https://github.com/envoyproxy/java-control-plane/pull/140 #142

Closed
wants to merge 9 commits into from

Conversation

nezdolik
Copy link
Member

This is duplicate of existing PR: #140 with attempt to kick off remote CI and check if test got fixed. No review required.

This commit adds support for the v3 xDS transport as well as support for
storing and serving v3 resources out of the resource cache.

Note that resource versions and xDS transport version are decoupled to
provide a migration path to v3. End users can decide to generate v3
resources and serve them over v2 transport during migration, or continue
to generate v2 resources and serve them over v3 transport.

For implementation simplicity, it is not possible to generate a
combination of v2 and v3 resources in the control plane, which would
require either up or down conversion.

Signed-off-by: Michael Puncel <mpuncel@squareup.com>
…adoc link. Use method overloading instead of different names for v2 vs v3 node hash

Signed-off-by: Michael Puncel <mpuncel@squareup.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Puncel <mpuncel@squareup.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Puncel <mpuncel@squareup.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Puncel <mpuncel@squareup.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Puncel <mpuncel@squareup.com>
…on tests

Signed-off-by: Michael Puncel <mpuncel@squareup.com>
Note that there are not tests that cover a different transport version
from resource version in the interest of not doubling the number of
integration tests.

Signed-off-by: Michael Puncel <mpuncel@squareup.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Puncel <mpuncel@squareup.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants