Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update README.md #2

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ Pact is an appropriate solution when both consumer(s) and provider can establish

### Does Pact only support synchronous HTTP/REST-based communication?

No, it is not restricted to HTTP/REST. Pact version 3.0 introduces messages for [services that communicate via event streams and message queues](https://github.com/Pact-foundation/Pact-specification/tree/version-3#version-30). There is also a blogpost by the makers of Pact, describing [Contract Testing Serverless and Asynchronous Applications](https://medium.com/@DoorDash/contract-testing-with-Pact-7cf108ced8c4).
No, it is not restricted to HTTP/REST. Pact version 3.0 introduces messages for [services that communicate via event streams and message queues](https://github.com/Pact-foundation/Pact-specification/tree/version-3#version-30). There is also a blogpost by the makers of Pact, describing [Contract Testing Serverless and Asynchronous Applications](https://doordash.engineering/2018/11/05/contract-testing-with-pact/).

### How can I deal with optional attributes/fields?

Expand Down