-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 110
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add validation for num_realizations > 1 for analysis modules #8404
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #8404 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.66% 90.83% +0.16%
==========================================
Files 347 347
Lines 21137 21145 +8
==========================================
+ Hits 19164 19207 +43
+ Misses 1973 1938 -35
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
rebase to trigger rerun of semeio? |
Could there be something in the user documentation that needs to be updated following this change? |
I thought it is somewhat implicit ert knowledge. But you are right, I'll add it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
if restart_run | ||
else 0, | ||
starting_iteration=( | ||
storage.get_ensemble(prior_ensemble).iteration + 1 if restart_run else 0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just cosmetic? No problem for me, but suggest putting in a separate commit.
This adds validation to model_factor for active realizations
Issue
Resolves #8348
blocked by semeio testsshould be ok nowApproach
Inject validation where needed.
(Screenshot of new behavior in GUI if applicable)
When applicable