Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade vitest from 1.5.3 to 1.6.0 #1029

Closed

Conversation

emirgens
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


![snyk-top-banner](https://github.com/andygongea/OWASP-Benchmark/assets/818805/c518c423-16fe-447e-b67f-ad5a49b5d123)

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade vitest from 1.5.3 to 1.6.0.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released on 21 days ago.

Release notes
Package name: vitest from vitest GitHub release notes

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade vitest from 1.5.3 to 1.6.0.

See this package in npm:
vitest

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/radix-team/project/9b8fdaaf-c458-4968-afc1-34794da22873?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
@emirgens emirgens requested a review from a team May 30, 2024 07:40
@Richard87 Richard87 self-assigned this Jun 4, 2024
@Richard87 Richard87 closed this Jun 4, 2024
@Richard87 Richard87 deleted the snyk-upgrade-4327625f814467c4a08f87f0aae9c20b branch June 4, 2024 08:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants