Make rlx_util:parse_vsn parse integer versions #913
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ferd
approved these changes
May 24, 2022
ferd
added a commit
to erlang/rebar3
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 18, 2022
- [Use `erlexec` directly in relx helper functions](erlware/relx#902) - [Make rlx_util:parse_vsn parse integer versions](erlware/relx#913) - [fix awk script check_name() in extended_bin](erlware/relx#915) - [avoid crash when overlay is malformed](erlware/relx#916) - [keep attributes when stripping beams](erlware/relx#906) - [Fix {include_erts,true} in Windows releases](erlware/relx#914) - [ensure the erl file is writable before copying dyn_erl to it](erlware/relx#903) - Various tests added
ferd
added a commit
to erlang/rebar3
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 18, 2022
New features: - [Add --offline option and REBAR_OFFLINE environment variable](#2643) - [Add support for project-local plugins](#2697) - [Add eunit --test flag](#2684) Experimental features for which we promise no backwards compatibility in the near future: - [Experimental vendoring provider](#2689) - [Support plugins in experimental vendor provider](#2702) Other changes: - [Support OTP 23..25 inclusively](#2706) - [Bump Relx to 4.7.0](#2718) - [Use `erlexec` directly in relx helper functions](erlware/relx#902) - [Make rlx_util:parse_vsn parse integer versions](erlware/relx#913) - [fix awk script check_name() in extended_bin](erlware/relx#915) - [avoid crash when overlay is malformed](erlware/relx#916) - [keep attributes when stripping beams](erlware/relx#906) - [Fix {include_erts,true} in Windows releases](erlware/relx#914) - [ensure the erl file is writable before copying dyn_erl to it](erlware/relx#903) - Various tests added - [Properly carry overlay_vars settings for files in relx](#2711) - [Track mib compilation artifacts](#2709) - [Attempt to find apps in git subdirs (sparse checkouts)](#2687) - [Do not discard parameters --system_libs and --include-erts when duplicate values exist](#2695) - [Use default `depth` parameter for SSL](#2690) - [Fix global cache config overriding](#2683) - [Error out on unknown templates in 'new' command](#2676) - [Fix a typo](#2674) - [Bump certifi to 2.9.0](#2673) - [add a debug message in internal dependency fetching code](#2672) - [Use SPDX id for license in template and test](#2668) - [Use default branch for git and git_subdir resources with no revision](#2663) Signed-off-by: Fred Hebert <mononcqc@ferd.ca>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This allows using integer release versions "1", "2" and so on instead of semver, like was possible in Relx 3. In current main branch this only seems to be an issue when creating relups without providing the previous version, in that case the crash happens at https://github.com/erlware/relx/blob/main/src/rlx_relup.erl#L95
I have also changed the returned value 0 because it resulted in unhelpful crashes down the line because the code didn't expect an integer but a tuple.
Tested against Erlang.mk tests.
Original PR: #911