test: simplify Bun detection in tests #544
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1 task
lumirlumir
approved these changes
Sep 30, 2025
Member
lumirlumir
left a comment
lumirlumir
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, thanks! Very nice cleanup.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prerequisites checklist
What is the purpose of this pull request?
Simplify Bun detection in tests by replacing the verbose checks with the direct
process.versions.bundetectionWhat changes did you make? (Give an overview)
Replaced all instances of
typeof process !== "undefined" && process.release?.name === "node" && !process.versions?.bunwith!process.versions.bunwhere tests should skip running on Bun.Related Issues
Fixes #540
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?