Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move SSLContext to its own header #5121

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 17, 2018
Merged

Conversation

earlephilhower
Copy link
Collaborator

Simple refactor to make WiFiClientSecureAxTLS use an external header to
define its SSLContext, just as it does for several other classes.

Fixes #3648

earlephilhower and others added 3 commits September 11, 2018 03:31
Simple refactor to make WiFiClientSecureAxTLS use an external header to
define its SSLContext, just as it does for several other classes.

Fixes esp8266#3648
@devyte
Copy link
Collaborator

devyte commented Sep 11, 2018

I would argue that it's a bad idea to extend the axtls-based WiFiClientSecure class, and that @schlaegerz should first migrate to bearssl, and then make any specific changes he needs on that.
However, since the effort is already spent in the PR, I'll approve.

@devyte devyte added this to the 2.5.0 milestone Sep 11, 2018
@schlaegerz
Copy link

Yep I plan to move to Bearssl, this was before that even existed. I end up needing to make a few changes to Bearssl to get what I want, but I haven't thought through exactly what the right things are

@devyte devyte merged commit 991d738 into esp8266:master Sep 17, 2018
d-a-v pushed a commit to d-a-v/Arduino that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2018
Simple refactor to make WiFiClientSecureAxTLS use an external header to
define its SSLContext, just as it does for several other classes.

Fixes esp8266#3648
@earlephilhower earlephilhower deleted the sslhdr branch September 30, 2018 17:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants