Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

documentation: gdb: Expand the limitations section #8879

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 11, 2023

Conversation

larsks
Copy link
Contributor

@larsks larsks commented Mar 6, 2023

It's trivial to run into a problem caused by the single hardware breakpoint
limitation, but the existing documentation doesn't explicitly address this
situation (and search results for the error message aren't particularly
helpful).

This commit updates the documentation with an explicit example of what
happens when a breakpoint expression matches multiple locations, along with
a possible workaround.

It's trivial to run into a problem caused by the single hardware breakpoint
limitation, but the existing documentation doesn't explicitly address this
situation (and search results for the error message aren't particularly
helpful).

This commit updates the documentation with an explicit example of what
happens when a breakpoint expression matches multiple locations, along with
a possible workaround.
@d-a-v d-a-v changed the title Expand the esp8266 hardware debugging limitations section documentation: gdb: Expand the limitations section Mar 11, 2023
@d-a-v d-a-v merged commit 6ad9bf3 into esp8266:master Mar 11, 2023
hasenradball pushed a commit to hasenradball/Arduino that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2024
It's trivial to run into a problem caused by the single hardware breakpoint
limitation, but the existing documentation doesn't explicitly address this
situation (and search results for the error message aren't particularly
helpful).

This commit updates the documentation with an explicit example of what
happens when a breakpoint expression matches multiple locations, along with
a possible workaround.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants