Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated ROCm to latest #166

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Updated ROCm to latest #166

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mkuron
Copy link
Member

@mkuron mkuron commented Apr 3, 2020

Since espressomd/espresso#3623, this should work now. I commented out the sed line because we might need it again in the future.

I have no idea how testing works now that @KaiSzuttor's changes are merged, so please do whatever is necessary.

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
FROM rocm/dev-ubuntu-18.04:3.0
FROM rocm/dev-ubuntu-18.04:latest
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd prefer to pin this to 3.3 so that it's clear which base image is used in that dockerfile.

Copy link
Member Author

@mkuron mkuron Apr 3, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then we need to put some procedure in place to regularly test against latest so we see when new versions break things. We should probably do the same for CUDA, where we tend to be at least 6 months behind on testing and support. CUDA typically also requires minor fixes to support a new release, and unless they are using Ubuntu's packages, people tend to upgrade their CUDA relatively quickly.

@jngrad
Copy link
Member

jngrad commented Apr 3, 2020

There is no testing and no building for PRs at the moment. It's being worked on in #163; once merged into this PR, the pipeline here will build the image and fail if the dockerfile is incorrect. You can then use the commit SHA in an espressomd/espresso PR to test the image there.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants