This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 28, 2022. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
various updates to capture & materialization protocols #5
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a01efb7
capture/materialize: switch driver checkpoint to RFC7396 merge patch
jgraettinger 3ee3ef5
materialize: add Validate for TransactionRequest / TransactionResponse
jgraettinger 7bb3fe0
materialize: lifecycle uses RecvMsg instead of Recv
jgraettinger 9278cbc
flow: re-export many common Gazette types to reduce import soup
jgraettinger File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this a common go idiom for treating a struct like an enum?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure I've seen enough of it to call it idiomatic. Mostly I don't see it checked, and it makes me☹️ .
Generics are finally coming to Go, but I'd dearly love me some Rust-like algebraic enums and pattern matching....