Include and stabilize experimental-compaction-sleep-interval flag in releases

[JalinWang]

What would you like to be added?

Two parameters govern the auto compaction process: experimental-compaction-batch-limit and experimental-compaction-sleep-interval. Despite being added three years ago in this PR commit, the sleep interval flag has yet to be included in any releases. Meanwhile, the batch limit flag is under stabilization consideration in issue, and I propose stabilizing the experimental-compaction-sleep-interval as well.

Why is this needed?

Compaction significantly affects service response time. Distributing pressure more evenly is desired, where these two params serve. While workarounds exist currently, retention window size has limit flexibility and it's better to utilize the built-in mechanism over additional independent maintenance scripts.

[ivanvc]

Discussed during the fortnightly triage meeting. I'll review the PR.

[JalinWang]

Discussed during the fortnightly triage meeting. I'll review the PR.

Thanks for the update! I'm looking forward to your feedback~

Also, the following PR for bbolt can greatly improve etcd performance in our scenario where free space is considerable (dbSize - dbSizeInUse) in some time. If possible, could you also mention the release for 1.4.0? The alpha0 was released in January and alpha1 in May, so it seems the next version could be expected in September. That would be a great step toward a stable 1.4.0. (Although we'll still need to wait for etcd 3.6 😫 )

## v1.4.0-alpha.0(2024-01-12) change log
- [Record the count of free page to improve the performance of hashmapFreeCount]
([https://github.com/etcd-io/bbolt/pull/585 ](https://github.com/etcd-io/bbolt/pull/585)).

Attachment: our pprof result screenshot ( dbSize ~11GB, dbSizeInUse ~6GB)

[ivanvc]

@JalinWang, can you help with the CHANGELOG pull request to mention #18514?

Regarding the bbolt change, I'd suggest opening an issue on its repository.

Thanks!

[JalinWang]

@JalinWang, can you help with the CHANGELOG pull request to mention #18514?

Sorry for the late PR. Plz review: #18556 :)

Regarding the bbolt change, I'd suggest opening an issue on its repository.

okkkkk~