Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mark etcd-local-tester as deprecated so we can remove it in future #19297

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jmhbnz
Copy link
Member

@jmhbnz jmhbnz commented Jan 28, 2025

While looking at something else in our tools/ directory the other day I stumbled into the local-tester directory and taking a brief look it seemed to me like it was something we no longer used as we have the massively more comprehensive robustness testing suite now. The last meaningful update to the tool looked to be about eight years ago.

I propose we mark this old utility as deprecated and remove it in future so we don't confuse anyone with what tool they should be using to validate etcd behaviour under failure conditions.

cc @serathius, @ahrtr

Signed-off-by: James Blair <mail@jamesblair.net>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 28, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.88%. Comparing base (35d20d1) to head (b2fba02).

Additional details and impacted files

see 30 files with indirect coverage changes

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #19297      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.84%   68.88%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         420      420              
  Lines       35689    35689              
==========================================
+ Hits        24570    24585      +15     
+ Misses       9693     9688       -5     
+ Partials     1426     1416      -10     

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 35d20d1...b2fba02. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@serathius serathius left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like bridge is s separate implementation of network failure injection that is already implemented by proxy package used by robustness tests.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ahrtr, jmhbnz, serathius

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [ahrtr,jmhbnz,serathius]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants