Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

staked factory with unstaked account rule fix #322

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 1, 2023
Merged

staked factory with unstaked account rule fix #322

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions eip/EIPS/eip-4337.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -488,8 +488,8 @@ The value of MIN_STAKE_VALUE is determined per chain, and specified in the "bund
Under the following special conditions, unstaked entities still can be used:

* An entity that doesn't use any storage at all, or only the senders's storage (not the entity's storage - that does require a stake)
* If the UserOp doesn't create a new account (that is initCode is empty), or the UserOp creates a new account using a
staked `factory` contract, then the entity may also use [storage associated with the sender](#storage-associated-with-an-address))
* An unstaked account can access [storage associated with the sender](#storage-associated-with-an-address) if the UserOp doesn't create a new account (that is initCode is empty), or the UserOp creates a new account using a
staked `factory` contract.
* A paymaster that has a “postOp()” method (that is, validatePaymasterUserOp returns “context”) must be staked

#### Specification.
Expand Down
Loading