-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Call for Input: Update ERC-6492 (Final) Reference Implementation #321
Comments
For the same reasons I mention in #291 (comment) I am opposed to merging this pull request. |
reference implementation change and notices (security considerations for e.g. in 291) we should be able to update, will keep EIPs fresh but we need a good process to verify such a change |
So is your opinion here, @g11tech, that we should or should not merge this PR? |
i am opposed to the current PR but would prefer some sort of section which can list newer updates and links to it (some meta/info EIP updating the reference) |
Thanks for clarifying. Closing this one since the only responses are opposed, but I am open to discuss a more comprehensive policy. |
@g11tech @SamWilsn what do you guys think about re-doing the PR in the following way:
|
See #291 (comment) for a bit more detail on my reasoning, but the short form is Final means Final, and we only allow updates to correct errors in the specification. |
Call for Input
Do we merge ethereum/ERCs#267 ?
ERC-6492's reference implementation is updated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: