Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

uniform capitalization of Fault Proof System #1049

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 30, 2024
Merged

Conversation

sbvegan
Copy link
Collaborator

@sbvegan sbvegan commented Oct 30, 2024

Description

  • We should capitalize "Fault Proof System"
  • Fault proofs should be lower case

@sbvegan sbvegan requested a review from a team as a code owner October 30, 2024 16:48
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 30, 2024

Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit c356784
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/67226777188cd40008bc9904
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1049--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new entry, "Fault Proof System," to the nouns.txt file, enhancing the list of nouns. Additionally, it modifies various documentation files to capitalize and clarify the term "Fault Proof System," ensuring consistent terminology throughout. The changes also include updates to the OP Stack's documentation, detailing new functionalities and configurations related to the Fault Proof System and the OP-Challenger, as well as a tutorial on tracking ETH burns on L1.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
nouns.txt New entry added: Fault Proof System.
pages/builders/chain-operators/hacks/settlement.mdx Text modification: "fault proof system" → "Fault Proof System" in the "Custom proofs" section.
pages/builders/chain-operators/tools/op-challenger.mdx Terminology updates and clarifications regarding the op-challenger configuration and operation.
pages/builders/chain-operators/tutorials/adding-derivation-attributes.mdx New contract L1Burn introduced, with functions for tracking ETH burns on L1.
pages/stack/explainer.mdx Expanded sections on Superchain concepts and upgrades, with terminology updates for clarity.
pages/stack/fault-proofs/challenger.mdx Metadata description updated to capitalize "Fault Proof System."
pages/stack/fault-proofs/explainer.mdx Capitalization of "Fault Proof System" in headers and content clarifications.
pages/stack/fault-proofs/fp-components.mdx Consistent capitalization of "Fault Proof System" throughout the document.
pages/stack/fault-proofs/fp-security.mdx Updates to the security model and references within the Fault Proof Mainnet upgrade.
pages/stack/security/faq.mdx Capitalization of "Fault Proof System" in the FAQ section.
pages/stack/smart-contracts.mdx Enhancements to clarity regarding the Fault Proof System and associated contracts.

Possibly related PRs

  • fp updates #732: This PR updates the documentation related to the Fault Proof System, which is directly relevant to the new entry "Fault Proof System" added in the main PR's nouns.txt.
  • challenger docs #759: This PR includes updates to the documentation for OP-Challenger, which operates within the context of the Fault Proof System, making it relevant to the changes in the main PR.
  • contracts: update standard version to v1.6.0, CGT to v2.0.0-beta.3 #895: This PR updates the recommended deployment version for contracts, which may include references to the Fault Proof System, thus connecting it to the main PR.
  • Add linked to SuperchainERC20 #1010: This PR adds a link to the SuperchainERC20 documentation, which is relevant to the new terminology introduced in the main PR.
  • fix superchainerc20 language #1045: This PR focuses on fixing language in the SuperchainERC20 documentation, which aligns with the updates made in the main PR regarding the terminology used.

Suggested labels

documentation

Suggested reviewers

  • bradleycamacho

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 65200a5 and c356784.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/stack/explainer.mdx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/stack/explainer.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
🔇 Additional comments (3)
pages/stack/explainer.mdx (3)

149-149: Maintain consistent capitalization of "fault proofs"

According to the PR objectives, "fault proofs" should be written in lowercase, which is correct in this instance.


151-151: Previous comment about capitalization is still valid

The existing review comment about capitalizing "fault proof system" to "Fault Proof System" is still applicable.


293-293: LGTM: Correct capitalization of "Fault Proof System"

The term is properly capitalized as "Fault Proof System" in this instance, which aligns with the PR objectives.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
pages/builders/chain-operators/tutorials/adding-derivation-attributes.mdx (2)

Line range hint 1-24: Consider using a more formal writing style

For technical documentation:

  • Replace contractions like "you're" with "you are"
  • Format external links more consistently, e.g., [ultrasound.money](https://ultrasound.money) instead of just the URL
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~276-~276: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘extremely’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: ...k on L1. That's crazy! The OP Stack is an extremely powerful platform that allows you to perform a l...

(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)


[uncategorized] ~276-~276: Use a comma before ‘or’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ...Stack. If you're looking for inspiration or you want to see what others are buildin...

(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE)


[style] ~276-~276: You have already used this phrasing in nearby sentences. Consider replacing it to add variety to your writing.
Context: ...s page. Maybe you'll find a project you want to work on, or maybe you'll get the inspir...

(REP_WANT_TO_VB)


[style] ~276-~276: You have already used this phrasing in nearby sentences. Consider replacing it to add variety to your writing.
Context: ... find a project you want to work on, or maybe you'll get the inspiration you need to ...

(REP_MAYBE)


Line range hint 183-185: Fix error message in L1BurnDepositBytes

The error message references "l1InfoTx" but should reference "l1BurnTx" for consistency:

-          return nil, NewCriticalError(fmt.Errorf("failed to create l1InfoTx: %w", err))
+          return nil, NewCriticalError(fmt.Errorf("failed to create l1BurnTx: %w", err))
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~276-~276: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘extremely’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: ...k on L1. That's crazy! The OP Stack is an extremely powerful platform that allows you to perform a l...

(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)


[uncategorized] ~276-~276: Use a comma before ‘or’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ...Stack. If you're looking for inspiration or you want to see what others are buildin...

(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE)


[style] ~276-~276: You have already used this phrasing in nearby sentences. Consider replacing it to add variety to your writing.
Context: ...s page. Maybe you'll find a project you want to work on, or maybe you'll get the inspir...

(REP_WANT_TO_VB)


[style] ~276-~276: You have already used this phrasing in nearby sentences. Consider replacing it to add variety to your writing.
Context: ... find a project you want to work on, or maybe you'll get the inspiration you need to ...

(REP_MAYBE)

pages/builders/chain-operators/tools/op-challenger.mdx (1)

198-198: LGTM! Consider minor rewording for clarity

The capitalization of "Fault Proof System" is correct and aligns with the project's terminology standards. However, consider rewording to improve flow:

- This is an optional step to use `op-challenger` subcommands, which allow chain operators to interact with the Fault Proof System onchain for testing and debugging purposes.
+ This optional step describes `op-challenger` subcommands that enable chain operators to interact with the Fault Proof System onchain for testing and debugging purposes.
pages/stack/explainer.mdx (1)

293-293: Enhance clarity of the settlement process description

While the capitalization of "Fault Proof System" is correct, the sentence structure could be improved to better explain the relationship between settlement and the Fault Proof System.

Consider this revision:

-Settlement of Plasma chains use a near identical Fault Proof System to Rollup chains with the only difference being that additional data is derived from the chain using the hashes that are finalized in the Plasma Contract.
+Settlement of Plasma chains utilizes a Fault Proof System nearly identical to that of Rollup chains, with one key difference: additional data is derived from the chain using hashes finalized in the Plasma Contract.
pages/stack/smart-contracts.mdx (2)

40-40: Simplify wordy phrase.

Replace "in order to" with "to" for conciseness:

-The upgrade was coupled with the [Granite network upgrade](/builders/node-operators/network-upgrades#granite) to improve the stability and performance of the Fault Proof System. In addition, the capabilities of the Guardian and DeputyGuardian have been extended to set the anchor state for the Fault Proof System in order to prevent referencing invalid anchor states.
+The upgrade was coupled with the [Granite network upgrade](/builders/node-operators/network-upgrades#granite) to improve the stability and performance of the Fault Proof System. In addition, the capabilities of the Guardian and DeputyGuardian have been extended to set the anchor state for the Fault Proof System to prevent referencing invalid anchor states.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~40-~40: Consider a shorter alternative to avoid wordiness.
Context: ...anchor state for the Fault Proof System in order to prevent referencing invalid anchor stat...

(IN_ORDER_TO_PREMIUM)


Inconsistent capitalization of "Fault Proof" terms needs standardization

The file shows inconsistent capitalization:

  • "Fault Proof System" (correct)
  • "fault proof system" (incorrect)
  • "Fault Proofs" (correct)
  • "fault proofs" (incorrect)

Please standardize the capitalization as follows:

  • "Fault Proof System" when referring to the system as a whole
  • "Fault Proofs" when referring to the feature or concept
  • "Fault Proof" when used as an adjective (e.g., "Fault Proof contracts")
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-999: Verify capitalization of "Fault Proof System" and related terms.

The capitalization of "Fault Proof System" appears consistent throughout the document. However, let's verify this across the codebase to ensure uniformity.


Based on the search results, I can verify that the capitalization of "Fault Proof System" and related terms is inconsistent across the codebase. Let me check for specific instances in the file under review.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for inconsistent capitalization of "Fault Proof System" and related terms
# Test: Search for variations of the term. Expect: Consistent capitalization.

echo "Checking for 'Fault Proof System' capitalization..."
rg -i "fault.?proof.?system"

echo "Checking for 'fault proofs' usage..."
rg -i "fault.?proofs"

Length of output: 57067


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for capitalization variations specifically in the file under review
echo "Checking capitalization in smart-contracts.mdx..."
rg -i "fault.?proof" pages/stack/smart-contracts.mdx

Length of output: 1429

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~40-~40: Consider a shorter alternative to avoid wordiness.
Context: ...anchor state for the Fault Proof System in order to prevent referencing invalid anchor stat...

(IN_ORDER_TO_PREMIUM)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 807cab9 and 65200a5.

📒 Files selected for processing (11)
  • nouns.txt (1 hunks)
  • pages/builders/chain-operators/hacks/settlement.mdx (1 hunks)
  • pages/builders/chain-operators/tools/op-challenger.mdx (1 hunks)
  • pages/builders/chain-operators/tutorials/adding-derivation-attributes.mdx (1 hunks)
  • pages/stack/explainer.mdx (2 hunks)
  • pages/stack/fault-proofs/challenger.mdx (1 hunks)
  • pages/stack/fault-proofs/explainer.mdx (3 hunks)
  • pages/stack/fault-proofs/fp-components.mdx (3 hunks)
  • pages/stack/fault-proofs/fp-security.mdx (1 hunks)
  • pages/stack/security/faq.mdx (1 hunks)
  • pages/stack/smart-contracts.mdx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
  • nouns.txt
  • pages/builders/chain-operators/hacks/settlement.mdx
  • pages/stack/fault-proofs/challenger.mdx
  • pages/stack/fault-proofs/fp-components.mdx
  • pages/stack/fault-proofs/fp-security.mdx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (6)
pages/builders/chain-operators/tools/op-challenger.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
pages/builders/chain-operators/tutorials/adding-derivation-attributes.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
pages/stack/explainer.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
pages/stack/fault-proofs/explainer.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
pages/stack/security/faq.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
pages/stack/smart-contracts.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
🪛 LanguageTool
pages/stack/fault-proofs/explainer.mdx

[grammar] ~81-~81: It seems that a verb or a comma is missing.
Context: ...nger` is forthcoming. ### How much ETH should a chain operator put aside to operate t...

(MD_DT_JJ)

pages/stack/security/faq.mdx

[uncategorized] ~35-~35: When a number forms part of an adjectival compound, use a hyphen.
Context: ... that system can be upgraded within the 7 day challenge window ("fast upgrade keys")*...

(MISSING_HYPHEN)

pages/stack/smart-contracts.mdx

[style] ~40-~40: Consider a shorter alternative to avoid wordiness.
Context: ...anchor state for the Fault Proof System in order to prevent referencing invalid anchor stat...

(IN_ORDER_TO_PREMIUM)

🔇 Additional comments (5)
pages/stack/fault-proofs/explainer.mdx (2)

4-4: LGTM: Description update follows guidelines

The capitalization of "Fault Proof System" aligns with the PR objectives and follows proper sentence case formatting.


48-48: LGTM: Modular design section follows documentation standards

The text maintains consistent capitalization of "Fault Proof System" while adhering to documentation guidelines for technical terminology and link formatting.

pages/builders/chain-operators/tools/op-challenger.mdx (2)

Line range hint 200-219: LGTM! Clear and well-structured command documentation

The subcommands table is well-organized and provides clear, concise descriptions. The additional information about op-dispute-mon is valuable for operators.


Line range hint 220-227: LGTM! Well-structured conclusion and next steps

The monitoring service information and next steps section provide clear guidance and valuable resources for operators.

pages/stack/explainer.mdx (1)

Line range hint 1-293: Documentation meets quality standards

The document:

  • Follows proper title case for headers
  • Uses technical terms consistently
  • Applies the Oxford comma correctly
  • Maintains a professional tone
  • Avoids gender-specific language
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~153-~153: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use “many” or “numerous”
Context: ...llengers must request attestations from a large number of chain attestors and combine these attes...

(LARGE_NUMBER_OF)

@sbvegan sbvegan merged commit 8131990 into main Oct 30, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
@sbvegan sbvegan deleted the sb-FPS-consistency branch October 30, 2024 17:26
@bradleycamacho
Copy link
Member

Added this to the product guide for future reference

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants