Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update monthly-issue-metircs.yml #1062

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2024
Merged

Update monthly-issue-metircs.yml #1062

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2024

Conversation

sbvegan
Copy link
Collaborator

@sbvegan sbvegan commented Nov 1, 2024

automatically add the monthly-report metrics label

Description

Tests

Additional context

Metadata

automatically add the monthly-report metrics label
@sbvegan sbvegan requested a review from a team as a code owner November 1, 2024 15:01
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 4dcdd47
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/6724ed4156962600081e9ce8
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1062--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the GitHub Actions workflow for generating the "Monthly Issue Metrics Report." It introduces new steps to handle closed issues, including running the issue-metrics tool for closed issues and creating a corresponding issue report. The modifications maintain the existing job structure while ensuring that both opened and closed issues are reported with appropriate labeling.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/monthly-issue-metircs.yml - Added a step to run the issue-metrics tool for closed issues.
- Introduced a step to create an issue for closed issues using peter-evans/create-issue-from-file@v4.
- Updated both steps for opened and closed issues to include a labels field set to monthly-report.

Possibly related PRs

  • Create monthly-issue-metircs.yml #862: The main PR updates the existing workflow for monthly issue metrics, while this retrieved PR creates the initial version of that workflow, indicating a direct relationship in terms of functionality and purpose.

Suggested reviewers

  • krofax

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/monthly-issue-metircs.yml (2)

Line range hint 1-1: Fix typo in workflow filename

The workflow filename contains a typo: "metircs" should be "metrics". Consider renaming the file from monthly-issue-metircs.yml to monthly-issue-metrics.yml.


Line range hint 1-67: Consider refactoring to reduce code duplication

The workflow contains duplicate steps for opened and closed issues that only differ in their search query and title. Consider refactoring using GitHub Actions matrix strategy to make the workflow more maintainable.

Here's how you could refactor the workflow:

name: Monthly Issue Metrics Report
on:
  workflow_dispatch:
  schedule:
    - cron: '0 0 1 * *'

permissions:
  issues: write
  pull-requests: read

jobs:
  build:
    name: docs issue metrics
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+   strategy:
+     matrix:
+       issue_type: [opened, closed]

    steps:
    - name: Get dates for last month
      shell: bash
      run: |
        first_day=$(date -d "last month" +%Y-%m-01)
        last_day=$(date -d "$first_day +1 month -1 day" +%Y-%m-%d)
        echo "last_month=$first_day..$last_day" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"

    - name: Run issue-metrics tool for issues last month
      uses: github/issue-metrics@v2
      env:
        GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
-       SEARCH_QUERY: 'repo:ethereum-optimism/docs is:issue created:${{ env.last_month }} -reason:"not planned" -label:monthly-report'
+       SEARCH_QUERY: >-
+         repo:ethereum-optimism/docs is:issue 
+         ${{ matrix.issue_type == 'opened' && 'created' || 'closed' }}:${{ env.last_month }}
+         -reason:"not planned"
+         -label:monthly-report

    - name: Create issue
      uses: peter-evans/create-issue-from-file@v4
      with:
-       title: ${{ env.last_month }} metrics report for opened issues
+       title: ${{ env.last_month }} metrics report for ${{ matrix.issue_type }} issues
        content-filepath: ./issue_metrics.md
        assignees: sbvegan
        labels: |
          monthly-report
-
-   - name: Run issue-metrics tool for issues last month
-     uses: github/issue-metrics@v2
-     env:
-       GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
-       SEARCH_QUERY: 'repo:ethereum-optimism/docs is:issue closed:${{ env.last_month }} -reason:"not planned" -label:monthly-report'
-
-   - name: Create issue for closed issues
-     uses: peter-evans/create-issue-from-file@v4
-     with:
-       title: ${{ env.last_month }} metrics report for closed issues
-       content-filepath: ./issue_metrics.md
-       assignees: sbvegan
-       labels: |
-         monthly-report

This refactoring:

  1. Uses matrix strategy to handle both opened and closed issues
  2. Eliminates code duplication
  3. Makes future modifications easier to maintain
  4. Reduces the chance of inconsistencies between the two report generations
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0e1e783 and 4dcdd47.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/monthly-issue-metircs.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/monthly-issue-metircs.yml (1)

44-45: LGTM: Labels implementation is correct

The addition of the monthly-report label is properly implemented using the YAML multi-line syntax.

@sbvegan sbvegan merged commit 0e47d23 into main Nov 5, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
@sbvegan sbvegan deleted the sbvegan-patch-1 branch November 5, 2024 00:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants