fix: Typo Corrections in Documentation

[cypherpepe]

Fixed typos in several documentation files, including those related to optimization, estimates, troubleshooting, and the custom gas token.

Additional context
This contribution aims to improve the quality of the project's documentation, which will help users navigate and utilize the provided information more effectively.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	f3ade02
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/672b8dc506f8c4000822be87
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1074--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request includes several modifications to documentation files related to transaction fee estimation, contract optimization, and troubleshooting on OP Mainnet. Key changes involve enhancing clarity and precision in the text, correcting grammatical errors, and providing updated guidance on transaction fees and contract optimization techniques. The revisions aim to improve overall readability and instructional quality without altering the underlying functionality of the documents.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
pages/builders/app-developers/contracts/optimization.mdx	Enhanced clarity on contract optimization, L1 Data Fee implications, and risks of complexity.
pages/builders/app-developers/transactions/estimates.mdx	Improved guidance on estimating transaction fees, including execution gas and L1 data fees.
pages/builders/app-developers/transactions/troubleshooting.mdx	Corrected grammatical errors and clarified troubleshooting guidance without altering content.
pages/builders/chain-operators/features/custom-gas-token.mdx	Corrected typographical errors and clarified instructions for running a custom gas token chain.

Possibly related issues

• [DOCS] errors in RPC and typos in docs  #1013: Addresses grammatical errors and typos in documentation, which aligns with the corrections made in this PR.

Possibly related PRs

• custom-gas-token #665: Relates to contract optimization considerations relevant to custom gas token documentation.
• docs: enhancements and typos #708: Enhances clarity on transaction fees, relevant to the optimization discussions in this PR.
• Docs improvements #776: Improvements in transaction fee estimation documentation relate to optimizing contracts and understanding costs.
• Estimate cost tut #913: Directly relevant to transaction fee models and optimizations discussed in this PR.
• Corrected rude grammar errors in docs #1055: Grammar corrections in documentation support the goal of enhancing clarity in contract optimization discussions.
• Documentation Improvements: Grammar, Structure, and Readability Fixes #1057: Overall improvements in documentation quality support clearer guidance on contract optimization.

Suggested reviewers

• cpengilly
• sbvegan

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.