Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Small nit #1156

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 2, 2024
Merged

Small nit #1156

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 2, 2024

Conversation

zainbacchus
Copy link
Contributor

Adding context around oracle problem before explaining what interop does

Adding context around oracle problem before explaining what interop does
@zainbacchus zainbacchus requested a review from a team as a code owner December 2, 2024 15:23
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit b44ad1e
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/674dd1009549c3000853873e
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1156--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 2, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several modifications to the "Interoperability explainer" document to enhance its clarity and comprehensiveness regarding blockchain interoperability. A new introductory paragraph has been added, discussing the Oracle problem and the challenges of verifying external information. The description of native OP Stack interoperability has been refined to clarify its function in reading messages and transferring assets across chains within the Superchain.

The benefits of interoperability are now more explicitly connected to the Superchain context. The explanation of secure message passing has been expanded to detail the message passing protocol and the Superchain ERC20 token specification. Additionally, the low latency section has been updated to specify optimistic acceptance of cross-chain messages, estimating latency at approximately 1-block (~2 seconds).

New sections have been added to introduce several predeploys, including CrossL2Inbox, L2ToL2CrossDomainMessenger, OptimismSuperchainERC20Factory, BeaconContract, and SuperchainERC20Bridge, each with their respective addresses. The document also addresses considerations for chain operators regarding the infrastructure needed for interoperability, specifically mentioning the op-supervisor service. The FAQs section has been retained, providing insights into various aspects of interoperability.

Possibly related PRs

  • interop explainers #825: This PR introduces new interop explainers, including a comprehensive guide on interoperability within the OP Stack, which aligns with the main PR's focus on enhancing the interoperability explainer document.
  • Update explainer.mdx #907: This PR updates the terminology in the explainer document to reflect "Superchain interop," which is relevant to the changes made in the main PR regarding the clarity of interoperability concepts.
  • Update cross-chain-message.mdx #932: Similar to Update explainer.mdx #907, this PR updates terminology in the cross-chain messaging document to align with the "Superchain interoperability," connecting it to the main PR's focus on interoperability explanations.
  • Edit SuperchainERC20 consistency #972: This PR focuses on consistency in the terminology used in the explainer document, specifically regarding the SuperchainERC20 token specification, which is a key aspect of the main PR's changes.
  • Add linked to SuperchainERC20 #1010: This PR enhances the explainer by adding details about the SuperchainERC20 token specification, directly linking it to the main PR's updates on interoperability features.
  • Clean up explainer #1107: This PR significantly updates the interoperability explainer, adding new sections and clarifying existing ones, which directly relates to the main PR's enhancements to the same document.
  • Provide an interop value-prop in more plain terms #1112: This PR adds a clearer explanation of interoperability's value proposition, which complements the main PR's goal of improving the clarity and understanding of interoperability concepts.
  • Add clarification re L1Admin #1145: This PR adds clarifications regarding governance in the interop cluster, which is relevant to the main PR's focus on enhancing the interoperability framework and its components.

Suggested labels

documentation

Suggested reviewers

  • cpengilly

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
pages/stack/interop/explainer.mdx (1)

Line range hint 89-133: Ensure consistent terminology usage throughout the predeploys section

While the technical content is accurate, maintain consistency in terminology:

  • Use "ERC-20" instead of "ERC20" throughout the document
  • Capitalize "Superchain" consistently when used as a proper noun

Example corrections:

-creates ERC20 contracts
+creates ERC-20 contracts

-These ERC20s are called
+These ERC-20s are called
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5d521cf and b44ad1e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/stack/interop/explainer.mdx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/stack/interop/explainer.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pages/stack/interop/explainer.mdx (1)

19-19: LGTM! Clear and precise explanation

The description accurately explains the native OP Stack interoperability functionality. The phrasing "across chains in the Superchain" provides better clarity about the scope of interoperability.

pages/stack/interop/explainer.mdx Show resolved Hide resolved
@krofax krofax merged commit e3f0614 into main Dec 2, 2024
8 of 9 checks passed
@krofax krofax deleted the zainbacchus-patch-3 branch December 2, 2024 15:42
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants