Update Documentation Format and Labels

[Dahka2321]

Changes Made

1. In .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/docs_audit_results.md:

• Old: labels: 'docs-audit-2024-Q4,op-labs'
• New: labels: ['docs-audit-2024-Q4', 'op-labs']

Reason: Updated the labels format to use proper YAML array syntax, which improves readability and follows standard YAML conventions. The new format using square brackets is more explicit and less prone to parsing errors.

2. In notes/content-reuse.md:

• Fixed list numbering (changed from all "1." to sequential "1.", "2.")

Reason: These changes improve documentation consistency, make imports more explicit, and fix formatting issues that could cause confusion.

Please review and let me know if any adjustments are needed.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	1f9fa33
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/674edfb1c0cc0a0008102e64
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1157--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to two files: the GitHub issue template for documentation audits and the content reuse instructions. In the issue template located at .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/docs_audit_results.md, the format of the labels field has been changed from a string to an array format. This adjustment aims to enhance the clarity and structure of the labels used in the template while leaving other sections, such as description and acceptance criteria, unchanged.

In the document notes/content-reuse.md, several modifications were made to improve clarity regarding content reuse instructions. Specifically, the numbering of steps in the sections "How to Use a Single Reusable Content Component" and "How to Use Multiple Reusable Content Components" was corrected, changing the first step from 1. to 2.. This change ensures proper sequence and readability without altering the original intent or functionality of the content.

Possibly related PRs

• adding audit template #891: This PR introduces a new audit template that includes a labels field formatted as an array, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR that also modifies the labels field in the same template file.
• update audit issue template #1068: This PR updates the audit issue template by adding new sections and enhancing clarity, which aligns with the main PR's focus on improving the structure of the labels field in the same template.
• Fix typos and remove duplicate entries Changes Made #1136: This PR corrects a typographical error in the docs_audit_results.md file, which is the same file modified in the main PR, indicating a direct connection in the context of documentation improvements.
• Corrected Hyphenation Issues in Documentation #1147: This PR addresses hyphenation issues in the documentation, including the audit template, which is relevant to the main PR's focus on improving the clarity and structure of the same template.

Suggested reviewers

• cpengilly

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

notes/content-reuse.md (1)

21-21: LGTM! Consider adding step numbers in code examples

The list numbering corrections improve the documentation's clarity. For even better readability, consider adding step numbers in the code example comments to match the numbered instructions.

Example enhancement:

- import DescriptionShort from '@/content/DescriptionShort.md' 
+ // Step 1: Import the component
+ import DescriptionShort from '@/content/DescriptionShort.md' 

Also applies to: 41-41

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e3f0614 and 1f9fa33.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/docs_audit_results.md (1 hunks)
• notes/content-reuse.md (2 hunks)