Update next steps in explainer

[zainbacchus]

• Fix link to Supersim
• Add link to predeploy

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	befdb5e
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/67896dea384e0400081ffbc5
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1255--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on updating the OP Stack interoperability explainer document located at pages/stack/interop/explainer.mdx. The changes involve refining the content and structure of the document, specifically modifying the "Standard Rollup Charter" link and updating the "Next steps" section. The primary modifications include replacing existing bullet points with new content that emphasizes watching an overview video about OP Stack interoperability and provides an updated link to the Supersim local development environment. These updates aim to enhance the document's clarity and provide more direct resources for users interested in understanding OP Stack interoperability.

Possibly related PRs

• Edit SuperchainERC20 consistency #972: Updates to the Interoperability Explainer document
• Add linked to SuperchainERC20 #1010: Adds link to SuperchainERC20 documentation
• Update next steps for SuperchainERC20 explainer #1224: Revises "Next steps" section in SuperchainERC20 explainer
• Remove ref to factory #1233: Adds section on major SuperchainERC20 implementation components

Suggested reviewers

• bradleycamacho
• sbvegan

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

pages/stack/interop/explainer.mdx (1)

214-214: Improve clarity and fix grammatical issues

Consider these improvements:

1. Make the security model statement more concise
2. Add Oxford comma in the final series
3. Review capitalization of "Protocol Upgrade"

-Each blockchain in the Superchain interop cluster shares the same security model to mitigate the weakest-link scenario. As outlined in the [Standard Rollup Charter](superchain/blockspace-charter), these chains share the same L1 `ProxyAdmin` Owner. Any changes to the Superchain interop cluster must follow the standard Protocol Upgrade vote procedure—the established governance process for Superchain modifications.
+Each blockchain in the Superchain interop cluster shares a common security model to prevent weak links. As outlined in the [Standard Rollup Charter](superchain/blockspace-charter), these chains share the same L1 `ProxyAdmin` Owner. Any changes to the Superchain interop cluster must follow the standard protocol upgrade vote procedure, the established process, and the Superchain governance requirements.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 91d44af and befdb5e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• pages/stack/interop/explainer.mdx (2 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (1)

pages/stack/interop/explainer.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

• Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
• Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
• Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
• Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
• Apply the Oxford comma.
• Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
• Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
• For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
  1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
  2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
  3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
• Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
• When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
  "

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)

• GitHub Check: Redirect rules - docs-optimism
• GitHub Check: Header rules - docs-optimism
• GitHub Check: Pages changed - docs-optimism
• GitHub Check: pr-workflow

🔇 Additional comments (1)

pages/stack/interop/explainer.mdx (1)

229-231: LGTM! Well-structured next steps section

The bullet points are well-organized, maintain consistent structure, and properly capitalize technical terms. The links follow the sentence case guideline for body content.