Skip to content

adding the release tags and binaries #1353

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 11, 2025
Merged

Conversation

sbvegan
Copy link
Collaborator

@sbvegan sbvegan commented Feb 11, 2025

Updating the notice page with the new release tags and will update this PR with the release notes once they're available

@sbvegan sbvegan requested a review from a team as a code owner February 11, 2025 21:04
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 11, 2025

Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit c686313
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/67abccd7e1a182000847e7dc
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1353--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 11, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@sbvegan has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 6 minutes and 18 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 98e9da4 and c686313.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/notices/pectra-changes.mdx (4 hunks)
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The document has been significantly revised to shift focus from chain operators to node operators regarding the Ethereum Pectra upgrade. The section originally titled "For chain operators" has been renamed to "For node operators," emphasizing the need for node operators to upgrade before activation dates, with specific steps outlined for them. The steps for upgrading have been consolidated under the new node operator section, and a warning callout has been added for full node operators running op-geth with gc-mode=full, indicating the need to reference specific release notes for an intermediate upgrade step, while archive node operators can skip this step. The previous instructions for chain operators have been moved to a new section, providing guidance on preparing for the OP Stack's Pectra L1 support. The section on fault proof enabled chains remains largely intact but is now positioned after the updated node operator instructions.

Possibly related PRs

  • Notice for the breaking changes for Ethereum's Pectra activation #1270: The changes in the main PR focus on reorganizing and detailing instructions specifically for node operators regarding the Ethereum Pectra upgrade, while the retrieved PR introduces a new document that outlines preparations for both chain and node operators related to the same upgrade, indicating a direct connection in content focus.

Suggested reviewers

  • bradleycamacho

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pages/notices/pectra-changes.mdx (1)

57-58: Fix grammar and formatting issues.

There are a few issues in this section:

  1. Double verb usage: "you're are"
  2. Missing space after period in "features.We"
-If you're are running a fault proof enabled chain
+If you are running a fault proof enabled chain
-features.We
+features. We
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~57-~57: “you’re” (you are) seems less likely than “you”.
Context: ...ctional after the L1 Pectra upgrade. If you're are running a fault proof enabled chain...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_CP_YOUARE_YOU)


[uncategorized] ~57-~57: Possible wrong verb form detected. Did you mean “been” or “being”?
Context: ... after the L1 Pectra upgrade. If you're are running a fault proof enabled chain, yo...

(BE_WITH_WRONG_VERB_FORM)


[style] ~58-~58: Consider using a more formal alternative.
Context: ...ncludes these features. We will provide more information as engineering work wraps up. We are tr...

(MORE_INFO)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dc326d0 and 99b2507.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/notices/pectra-changes.mdx (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.mdx`: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with ...

**/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
  • pages/notices/pectra-changes.mdx
🪛 LanguageTool
pages/notices/pectra-changes.mdx

[duplication] ~50-~50: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ...test release. * op-node at v1.11.0 * op-geth at v1.101500.0 ## For chain operato...

(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)


[uncategorized] ~57-~57: “you’re” (you are) seems less likely than “you”.
Context: ...ctional after the L1 Pectra upgrade. If you're are running a fault proof enabled chain...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_CP_YOUARE_YOU)


[uncategorized] ~57-~57: Possible wrong verb form detected. Did you mean “been” or “being”?
Context: ... after the L1 Pectra upgrade. If you're are running a fault proof enabled chain, yo...

(BE_WITH_WRONG_VERB_FORM)


[style] ~58-~58: Consider using a more formal alternative.
Context: ...ncludes these features. We will provide more information as engineering work wraps up. We are tr...

(MORE_INFO)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: pr-workflow

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
pages/notices/pectra-changes.mdx (1)

54-54: ⚠️ Potential issue

Add missing version link for op-node.

The version link for op-node v1.11.0 is empty. Please add the correct GitHub release URL.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[duplication] ~54-~54: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ...test release. * op-node at v1.11.0 * op-geth at [v1.101500.0](https://github.com/ethe...

(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pages/notices/pectra-changes.mdx (1)

61-61: Consider using a more robust anchor reference.

The current anchor reference #update-to-the-latest-release might break if the heading text changes. Consider adding an explicit ID to the heading for a more stable reference.

-[Node Operator section](#update-to-the-latest-release)
+[Node Operator section](#node-operator-update)

And add an ID to the corresponding heading:

-### Update to the latest release
+### Update to the latest release {#node-operator-update}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 99b2507 and 3e1a593.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/notices/pectra-changes.mdx (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.mdx`: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with ...

**/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
  • pages/notices/pectra-changes.mdx
🪛 LanguageTool
pages/notices/pectra-changes.mdx

[uncategorized] ~13-~13: Possible wrong verb form detected. Did you mean “been” or “being”?
Context: ... after the L1 Pectra upgrade. If you're are running a fault proof enabled chain, yo...

(BE_WITH_WRONG_VERB_FORM)


[style] ~14-~14: Consider using a more formal alternative.
Context: ...ncludes these features. We will provide more information as engineering work wraps up. We are tr...

(MORE_INFO)


[duplication] ~54-~54: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ...test release. * op-node at v1.11.0 * op-geth at [v1.101500.0](https://github.com/ethe...

(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: pr-workflow
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - docs-optimism

sbvegan and others added 4 commits February 11, 2025 14:01
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@sbvegan sbvegan merged commit 9f7d8ee into main Feb 11, 2025
8 checks passed
@sbvegan sbvegan deleted the sb/pectra-binaries-updated branch February 11, 2025 22:31
This was referenced Feb 12, 2025
This was referenced Mar 11, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants