Clarify that step 3 is just sending the message, it is not received until step 4 #1409
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!Built without sensitive environment variables
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request modifies the sequence diagram on the Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant SB as Source Bridge
participant AR as Autorelayer
participant DCM as Destination Messenger
SB->>AR: Emit Initiating Message for Token Relay
AR->>DCM: Send Executing Message
DCM--)DCM: Execute Token Relay (upon receiving executing message)
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pages/stack/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx (1)
82-83: Enhance explanatory clarity for message relay timing.The new explanatory lines effectively clarify that the call at step 3 is only simulated by emitting an initiating message, with actual execution deferred until an executing message is received. For stylistic consistency—and to align with documentation guidelines that recommend avoiding excessive emphasis—consider removing the italics around the word “initiated.”
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pages/stack/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.mdx`: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with ...
**/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
- For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
- Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
- Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
- Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
- Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
- When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
"
pages/stack/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pages/stack/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx (1)
64-64: Clarify arrow notation for asynchronous message sending.Changing the arrow from a solid style to a dashed style in step 3 clearly indicates that the message is only being sent (not immediately received), which directly addresses the PR objective. Consider adding a legend or brief note elsewhere in the document if similar diagram symbols are used throughout the documentation.
|
looks perfect ty for the fix! |
Description
In the step by step diagram, steps 1-3 are the initiating message, steps 4-5 are the executing message. This fix clarifies that.
Tests
N/A
Additional context
N/A
Metadata
N/A