Skip to content

Conversation

@zainbacchus
Copy link
Contributor

Based on user feedback re confusion can anyone deploy my token anywhere on the cluster, clean up next steps

Based on user feedback, clean up next steps
@zainbacchus zainbacchus requested a review from a team as a code owner March 7, 2025 14:31
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 7, 2025

Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit c3595da
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/67cb054f50e59b000846f68f
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1477--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 7, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The documentation file pages/stack/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx has been updated to clarify the deployment instructions. The bullet point originally stating the deployment of the ERC-20 contract now specifies the deployment of the SuperchainERC20 contract at the same address on every chain where the token should be available. The updated instruction emphasizes that failing to deploy on a specific destination chain will prevent token transfers. Additionally, sections comparing other token implementations and an FAQ about the consequences of missing deployments have been removed to streamline the content.

Possibly related PRs

  • How to transfer a SuperchainERC20 #1048: The changes in the main PR regarding the deployment instructions for the SuperchainERC20 contract are directly related to the retrieved PR, which provides guidance on transferring the same SuperchainERC20 token.
  • Edit SuperchainERC20 consistency #972: The changes in the main PR regarding the deployment instructions for SuperchainERC20 are directly related to the terminology consistency updates made in the retrieved PR, as both focus on the SuperchainERC20 contract.
  • superchainERC20 #986: The changes in the main PR regarding the deployment instructions for the SuperchainERC20 contract are directly related to the modifications in the retrieved PR, which introduces the SuperchainERC20 Token Standard and outlines its operational mechanics.

Suggested reviewers

  • krofax
  • bradleycamacho

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b186865 and c3595da.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/stack/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • pages/stack/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
pages/stack/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx (1)

1-5: ⚠️ Potential issue

Missing required frontmatter metadata fields.
The frontmatter only includes title, lang, and description, but for a regular page the required fields (topic, personas, categories, and content_type) are missing. Please update the metadata by running the following command and then review the changes:

pnpm metadata-batch-cli:dry "pages/stack/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx"
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1959776 and 5701860.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/stack/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.mdx`: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with ...

**/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • First, check the frontmatter section at the top of the file:
    1. For regular pages, ensure ALL these fields are present and not empty:
    ---
    title: [non-empty]
    lang: [non-empty]
    description: [non-empty]
    topic: [non-empty]
    personas: [non-empty array]
    categories: [non-empty array]
    content_type: [valid type]
    ---
    1. For landing pages (index.mdx or files with ), only these fields are required:
    ---
    title: [non-empty]
    lang: [non-empty]
    description: [non-empty]
    topic: [non-empty]
    ---
    1. If any required fields are missing or empty, comment:
      'This file appears to be missing required metadata. You can fix this by running:
    pnpm metadata-batch-cli:dry "path/to/this/file.mdx"
    Review the changes, then run without :dry to apply them.'
  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
  • pages/stack/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: sbvegan
PR: ethereum-optimism/docs#1376
File: pages/stack/interop/tutorials/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx:125-131
Timestamp: 2025-02-20T08:02:49.192Z
Learning: Use descriptive placeholders (e.g., 'YOUR_KEY_HERE') instead of example values when documenting sensitive information like private keys in documentation files to prevent users from accidentally using insecure values.
pages/stack/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx (1)
Learnt from: sbvegan
PR: ethereum-optimism/docs#1376
File: pages/stack/interop/tutorials/deploy-superchain-erc20.mdx:125-131
Timestamp: 2025-02-20T08:02:49.192Z
Learning: Use descriptive placeholders (e.g., 'YOUR_KEY_HERE') instead of example values when documenting sensitive information like private keys in documentation files to prevent users from accidentally using insecure values.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - docs-optimism
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pages/stack/interop/superchain-erc20.mdx (1)

122-123: Verify consistency in video walkthrough reference.
The bullet point for the video walkthrough uses "ERC20 to SuperchainERC20," which is consistent with the title if the change in the previous bullet is corrected. Please ensure that all documentation references remain uniform once the naming inconsistency is addressed.

@bradleycamacho bradleycamacho merged commit 9426364 into main Mar 7, 2025
8 checks passed
@bradleycamacho bradleycamacho deleted the zainbacchus-patch-3 branch March 7, 2025 14:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants