Skip to content

Fix broken link #1555

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Fix broken link #1555

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Hopium21
Copy link
Contributor

@Hopium21 Hopium21 commented Apr 4, 2025

Fix broken link

@Hopium21 Hopium21 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 4, 2025 08:47
Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 4, 2025

Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 74cfa99
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/67ef9cb61e3e8f0008962456
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1555--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 4, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the link references in the pages/stack/security/faq.mdx file. The modifications change the URL paths for two hyperlinks: one pointing to the stack's design principles and the other to the security policy. The relative paths have been replaced with explicit paths that include the file extension (e.g., from /stack/design-principles to pages/stack/design-principles.mdx), ensuring that the links reference the correct markdown files. No other content or functionality has been changed.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix broken links #884: Addresses similar link updates in documentation by fixing broken links, which relates to the URL modifications in this pull request.

Suggested reviewers

  • sbvegan

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pages/stack/security/faq.mdx (1)

58-58: Link URL consistency: use an absolute path for design principles
The updated link [the stack's design principles](pages/stack/design-principles.mdx) is now explicit with a file extension, which is good; however, it is provided as a relative path. Given that the "Security Policy" link later in the file uses an absolute path (/pages/stack/security/security-policy.mdx), it would be beneficial to update this link for design principles to use a leading slash (i.e., /pages/stack/design-principles.mdx). This ensures consistency and correct resolution from any location in the documentation.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b9a605 and 74cfa99.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/stack/security/faq.mdx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.mdx`: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria: - First, check the frontmatter section at the top of the file: 1. For regular pages, ensure AL...

**/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • First, check the frontmatter section at the top of the file:
    1. For regular pages, ensure ALL these fields are present and not empty:
    ---
    title: [non-empty]
    lang: [non-empty]
    description: [non-empty]
    topic: [non-empty]
    personas: [non-empty array]
    categories: [non-empty array]
    content_type: [valid type]
    ---
    1. For landing pages (index.mdx or files with ), only these fields are required:
    ---
    title: [non-empty]
    lang: [non-empty]
    description: [non-empty]
    topic: [non-empty]
    ---
    1. If any required fields are missing or empty, comment:
      'This file appears to be missing required metadata. Please check keywords.config.yaml for valid options and add the required fields manually. You can validate your changes by running:
    pnpm validate-metadata
    ```'
  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
  • pages/stack/security/faq.mdx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - docs-optimism
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - docs-optimism
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pages/stack/security/faq.mdx (1)

62-62: Security Policy link update appears correct
The changed URL [Security Policy](/pages/stack/security/security-policy.mdx) now explicitly includes the file extension and uses an absolute path. This should resolve the broken link issue effectively.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants