Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

op-deployer: fix nil dereference of SuperchainRoles #13178

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2024

Conversation

bitwiseguy
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@bitwiseguy bitwiseguy requested a review from mslipper December 3, 2024 02:23
@bitwiseguy bitwiseguy requested a review from a team as a code owner December 3, 2024 02:23
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 50.66%. Comparing base (72ec8d3) to head (40d05ea).
Report is 8 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop   #13178      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    44.40%   50.66%   +6.26%     
===========================================
  Files          806        1     -805     
  Lines        72628       75   -72553     
===========================================
- Hits         32248       38   -32210     
+ Misses       37762       31   -37731     
+ Partials      2618        6    -2612     
Flag Coverage Δ
cannon-go-tests-32 ?
cannon-go-tests-64 ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 806 files with indirect coverage changes

@mslipper mslipper added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 3, 2024
Merged via the queue into develop with commit a46cc61 Dec 3, 2024
44 checks passed
@mslipper mslipper deleted the ss/fix-deployer-superchainroles branch December 3, 2024 18:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants