-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
support Ecotone l1 block info #8786
support Ecotone l1 block info #8786
Conversation
d0ef9f7
to
5ce4ea1
Compare
bd11f38
to
d5dd1a3
Compare
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes involve a significant integration of Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
83f4ab1
to
c12d836
Compare
re: baseFee vs basefee, seems in our quick poll there is strong preference for the former, so reverted much of the conversion. |
dbaf31b
to
edce397
Compare
Thanks, diff may be a bit less noisy now from backtracking on the basefee style change. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did a pass to check out attaching the rollup.Config
to channelBuilder
, looks like that works well assuming test behaviors are steady :D
While I was here I noticed some leftovers from reverting Basefee
spelling changes, so I marked those.
edce397
to
05adc1c
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #8786 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 34.70% 34.66% -0.05%
===========================================
Files 165 165
Lines 7123 7123
Branches 1208 1208
===========================================
- Hits 2472 2469 -3
- Misses 4499 4504 +5
+ Partials 152 150 -2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
Resolved merge conflict with develop in deposits.md, with clarification PR from @tynes. |
034a993
Description
Extend op-node to handle the change in L1 block info for the Ecotone upgrade.
Clarify spec around how the l1 data fee cost parameters are to be handled during upgrade.
ref: https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/protocol-quest/issues/56
Tests
Round trip fuzz tests extended to handle Ecotone version of marshal/unmarshal, unit tests to make sure l1 attribute handling edge cases around the first-ecotone-block are handled correctly.