-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Net gas metering for SSTORE without dirty maps
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
109 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ | ||
--- | ||
eip: <to be assigned> | ||
This comment has been minimized.
Sorry, something went wrong. |
||
title: Net gas metering for SSTORE without dirty maps | ||
author: Wei Tang (@sorpaas) | ||
discussions-to: <URL> | ||
status: Draft | ||
type: Standards Track | ||
category: Core | ||
created: 2018-08-01 | ||
--- | ||
|
||
## Abstract | ||
|
||
This EIP proposes net gas metering changes for SSTORE opcde, as an | ||
alternative for EIP-1087. It tries to be friendlier to implementations | ||
that uses different opetimiazation strategies for storage change | ||
caches. | ||
|
||
## Motivation | ||
|
||
EIP-1087 proposes a way to adjust gas metering for SSTORE opcode, | ||
enabling new usages on this opcodes where it is previously too | ||
expensive. However, EIP-1087 requires keeping a dirty map for storage | ||
changes, and implictly makes the assumption that a transaction's | ||
storage changes are committed to the storage trie at the end of a | ||
transaction. This works well for some implementations, but not for | ||
others. Some implementations do the optimization to only commit | ||
storage changes at the end of a block. For them, it is possible to | ||
know a storage's original value and current value, but it is not | ||
possible to iterate over all storage changes. For EIP-1087, they will | ||
need to keep a separate dirty map to keep track of gas costs. This | ||
adds additional memory consumptions. | ||
|
||
This EIP proposes an alternative way for gas metering on SSTORE, using | ||
information that is more universially available to most | ||
implementations: | ||
|
||
* *Storage slot's original value*. This is the value of the storage if | ||
a call/create reversion happens on the current VM execution | ||
context. It is universially available because all clients need to | ||
keep track of call/create reversion. | ||
* *Storage slot's current value*. | ||
* Refund counter. | ||
|
||
## Specification | ||
|
||
Term *original value* is as defined in Motivation. *Current value* | ||
refers to the storage slot value before SSTORE happens. *New value* | ||
refers to the storage slot value after SSTORE happens. | ||
|
||
Replace SSTORE opcode gas cost calculation (including refunds) with | ||
the following logic: | ||
|
||
* If *current value* equals *new value* (this is a no-op), 200 gas is | ||
deducted. | ||
* If *current value* does not equal *new value* | ||
* If *original value* equals *current value* (this storage slot has | ||
not been change by the current execution context) | ||
* If *original value* is 0, 20000 gas is deducted. | ||
* Otherwise, 5000 gas is deducted. If *new value* is 0, add 15000 | ||
gas to refund counter. | ||
* If *original value* does not equal *current value* (this storage | ||
slot is dirty), 200 gas is deducted. | ||
* If *original value* equals *new value* | ||
* If *original value* is 0, add 19800 gas to refund counter. | ||
* Otherwise, add 4800 gas to refund counter. | ||
|
||
Refund counter works as before -- it is limited to half of the gas | ||
consumed. | ||
|
||
## Rationale | ||
|
||
This EIP mostly archives what EIP-1087 tries to do, but without the | ||
complexity of introducing the concept of "dirty maps". One limitation | ||
is that the dirtiness tracking only applies to current execution | ||
context -- if a sub-frame executes on the same address as the | ||
parent-frame, it won't benefit from the parent dirtiness gas refund. | ||
|
||
Examine examples provided in EIP-1087's Motivation: | ||
|
||
* If a contract with empty storage sets slot 0 to 1, then back to 0, | ||
it will be charged `20000 + 200 - 19800 = 400` gas. | ||
* A contract with empty storage that increments slot 0 5 times will be | ||
charged `20000 + 5 * 200 = 21000` gas. | ||
* A balance transfer from account A to account B followed by a | ||
transfer from B to C, with all accounts having nonzero starting and | ||
ending balances | ||
* If the token contract has multi-send function, it will cost | ||
`5000 * 3 + 200 - 4800 = 10400` gas. | ||
* If this transfer from A to B to C is invoked by a third-party | ||
contract, and the token contract has no multi-send function, then | ||
it won't benefit from this EIP's gas reduction. | ||
|
||
## Backwards Compatibility | ||
|
||
This EIP requires a hard fork to implement. No gas cost increase is | ||
anticipated, and many contract will see gas reduction. | ||
|
||
## Test Cases | ||
|
||
To be added. | ||
|
||
## Implementation | ||
|
||
To be added. | ||
|
||
## Copyright | ||
|
||
Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). | ||
This comment has been minimized.
Sorry, something went wrong. |
Sstore