Updated solidity syntax in EIP-191 specs #1547
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
If this is merged I suggest that example is wrapped into proper code-quote blocks and a note is left what version of Solidity the example is for. |
|
Said and done! |
ilanolkies
pushed a commit
to ilanolkies/EIPs
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 12, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As of the latest stable version of solidity (0.4.25), a contract can reference its own address by calling
address(this)not justthis. Furthermore,keccak256will no longer accept multiple parameters in the future, hence now we need to useabi.encodePacked.