Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ready for last call. #2189

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jul 16, 2019
Merged

Ready for last call. #2189

merged 8 commits into from
Jul 16, 2019

Conversation

gcolvin
Copy link
Contributor

@gcolvin gcolvin commented Jul 12, 2019

Monday, July 14 would be a good day to start.

EIPS/eip-615.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -1,27 +1,27 @@
---
eip: 615
title: Subroutines and Static Jumps for the EVM
status: Draft
status: Last Call
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Last call deadline field is missing.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

review-period-end: is missing indeed
According to EIP-1 that's normally 14 days, but I suppose it's up to the author.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think EIP-1 leaves the date to the discretion of the Editor, not the author.

@axic
Copy link
Member

axic commented Jul 12, 2019

As a side note, I don't think editors should create branches on this repo.

Copy link
Contributor

@nicksavers nicksavers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There were quite a few significant changes in this PR.
Are you sure you also want to put this in Last Call right away?

EIPS/eip-615.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-615.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-615.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -1,27 +1,27 @@
---
eip: 615
title: Subroutines and Static Jumps for the EVM
status: Draft
status: Last Call
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

review-period-end: is missing indeed
According to EIP-1 that's normally 14 days, but I suppose it's up to the author.

EIPS/eip-615.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@gcolvin
Copy link
Contributor Author

gcolvin commented Jul 14, 2019

@nicksavers On whether changes should delay last call. Hardly any changes are substantial, and those are fixing small errors. Mainly I'm clarifying the intro material, (failing) to fix some spelling and formatting, and getting some opcode names right.

@gcolvin
Copy link
Contributor Author

gcolvin commented Jul 14, 2019

@axic On branching off this repo. You are probably right, though it is very convenient, and we do it often enough we should probably discuss when it's appropriate. I'll continue to use this branch until it's merged.

Suggested review-period-end in 14 days
@nicksavers
Copy link
Contributor

Note that EIP-1702 has been merged and can be directly linked.

@gcolvin gcolvin merged commit c9010a4 into master Jul 16, 2019
@gcolvin
Copy link
Contributor Author

gcolvin commented Jul 16, 2019

@axic @nicksavers I fixed the EIP-1702 link and merged. Thanks!

@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ The result is that all of the following validations and optimizations can be don

### Dependencies

> **[EIP-1702](https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/pull/1702). Generalized Account Versioning Scheme.** This proposal needs a versioning scheme to allow for its bytecode (and eventually eWasm bytecode) to be deployed with existing bytecode on the same blockchain.
> **[EIP-1702](http://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1702). Generalized Account Versioning Scheme.** This proposal needs a versioning scheme to allow for its bytecode (and eventually eWasm bytecode) to be deployed with existing bytecode on the same blockchain.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Btw if this is a dependency, it should have been added to the requires header.

@axic axic deleted the gcolvin-patch-1 branch July 17, 2019 22:41
ilanolkies pushed a commit to ilanolkies/EIPs that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2019
* Update eip-615.md

* Update discussion-to link.

* Update eip-615.md

* Update eip-615.md

* Update eip-615.md

* Update eip-615.md

* Update eip-615.md

Suggested review-period-end in 14 days

* Update eip-615.md
MadeofTin pushed a commit to MadeofTin/EIPs that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2019
* Update eip-615.md

* Update discussion-to link.

* Update eip-615.md

* Update eip-615.md

* Update eip-615.md

* Update eip-615.md

* Update eip-615.md

Suggested review-period-end in 14 days

* Update eip-615.md
BelfordZ pushed a commit to BelfordZ/EIPs that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2019
* Update eip-615.md

* Update discussion-to link.

* Update eip-615.md

* Update eip-615.md

* Update eip-615.md

* Update eip-615.md

* Update eip-615.md

Suggested review-period-end in 14 days

* Update eip-615.md
tkstanczak pushed a commit to tkstanczak/EIPs that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2020
* Update eip-615.md

* Update discussion-to link.

* Update eip-615.md

* Update eip-615.md

* Update eip-615.md

* Update eip-615.md

* Update eip-615.md

Suggested review-period-end in 14 days

* Update eip-615.md
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants