Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update EIP-1202: Resolve new EIPW and bring this EIP back to live #3848

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Oct 31, 2022
Merged

Update EIP-1202: Resolve new EIPW and bring this EIP back to live #3848

Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
cc0346d
Move EIP-1202 from DRAFT to REVIEW
xinbenlv Sep 5, 2021
b50d780
Move EIP-1202 from Draft to Last Call
xinbenlv Sep 5, 2021
f8f9f6e
Update eip-1202.md
xinbenlv Sep 5, 2021
8315fea
Update eip-1202.md
xinbenlv Sep 10, 2021
bda186e
Update eip-1202.md
xinbenlv Sep 12, 2021
fd4bfd3
Change from `contract` to `interface`
xinbenlv Sep 15, 2021
51b740d
Update the interface and split into 3 sub interfaces
xinbenlv Sep 16, 2021
5f0a8be
Update eip-1202.md
xinbenlv Sep 16, 2021
c3ea401
Update eip-1202.md
xinbenlv Sep 16, 2021
66550a3
Merge
xinbenlv Oct 27, 2022
2b8afdc
Update format
xinbenlv Oct 27, 2022
0f003ad
Fix reviews
xinbenlv Oct 27, 2022
38f5f66
Update
xinbenlv Oct 27, 2022
b649be6
Update
xinbenlv Oct 27, 2022
41f183c
Update
xinbenlv Oct 27, 2022
948fe8e
Update
xinbenlv Oct 27, 2022
3624833
Updates
xinbenlv Oct 27, 2022
fde450c
Update
xinbenlv Oct 27, 2022
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
39 changes: 1 addition & 38 deletions EIPS/eip-1202.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ title: Voting Standard
author: Zainan Victor Zhou (@xinbenlv), Evan (@evbots), Yin Xu (@yingogobot)
type: Standards Track
category: ERC
status: Draft
status: Review
created: 2018-07-08
discussions-to: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/1202
---
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -82,20 +82,6 @@ We made the following design decisions and here are the rationales.
## Backward Compatibility
There is no backward compatibility issue we are aware of.

## Simple Code Examples
### Example 1: Simplest Version: Single Issue Yes/No Question Per Smart Contract Address Per Non-Weighted Vote

- [Source Code](https://github.com/xinbenlv/eip-1202-draft/blob/master/contracts/simple-version/SimplestVote1202.sol)
- [Deployment (Ropsten)](https://ropsten.etherscan.io/address/0x067e76ddd9c67f7ae606b18d881545512d4b680c#code)

### Example 2: TokenVote with Simple Interface with Weight Assigned by Token and Pre-registered Snapshot of Token-Holders
- [Source Code](https://github.com/xinbenlv/eip-1202-draft/blob/master/contracts/simple-version/TokenVote1202.sol)
- [Deployment (Ropsten)](https://ropsten.etherscan.io/address/0x5bd007a224fe8820b19cc0bce8e241f4752ce74d#code)

### Example 3: TokenVote with Advanced Interface
- [Source Code](https://github.com/xinbenlv/eip-1202-draft/blob/master/contracts/advanced-version/AdvancedTokenVote1202.sol)
- [Deployment (Ropsten)](https://ropsten.etherscan.io/address/0xfd8b3be5f9db4662d1c9269f948345b46e37fd26#code)

## Security Considerations

EIP-1202 is a voting standard. We expect the voting standard to be used in connection with other contracts such as token distributions, conducting actions in consensus or on behalf of an entity, multi-signature wallets, etc.
Expand All @@ -113,29 +99,6 @@ The third consideration is non-trivialness. Some voting applications assume ***a

The fourth consideration is potential abuse. When voting is standardized and put on contract, it is possible to write another contract that rewards a voter to vote in a certain way. It creates potential issues of bribery and conflict of interest abuse that is previously hard to implement.


## Bibliography
### Related EIPs
- [EIP-20: ERC-20 Token Standard (a.k.a. ERC-20)](./eip-20.md)
- [EIP-165: Standard Interface Detection](./eip-165.md)
- [EIP-721: Non-Fungible Token Standard(a.k.a. ERC-721)](./eip-721.md)
- [EIP-735: ERC: Claim Holder](https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/735)
- [EIP-780: ERC: Ethereum Claims Registry](https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/780)
- [EIP-777: A New Advanced Token Standard](./eip-777.md)
- [EIP-897: ERC DelegateProxy](./eip-897.md)
- [EIP-1155: Crypto Item Standard](./eip-1155.md)
- [EIP-1178: Multi-class Token Standard](./eip-1178.md)
- [EIP-1167: Minimal Proxy Contract](./eip-1167.md)
- [EIP-1203: Multi-class Token Standard(ERC-20 Extension)](./eip-1203.md)

### Worthnoting Projects
- [Ethereum DAO: How to build a DEMOCRACY on the blockchain](https://www.ethereum.org/dao)
- [Carbon Vote](http://carbonvote.com/)
- [Paper: A Smart Contract for Boardroom Voting with Maximum Voter Privacy](https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/110.pdf) - *Suggested by @aodhgan*
- [Private Voting for TCR](https://blog.enigma.co/private-voting-for-tcrs-with-enigma-b441b5d4fa7b)
- [Consensus/PLCR implementation](https://github.com/ConsenSys/PLCRVoting)
- [Aragon Voting App](https://wiki.aragon.org/dev/apps/voting/)

## Acknowledgement
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
## Acknowledgement
## Acknowledgement

Please also remove this section as it also invalid.

We appreciate Ansley, Andrew, Fred from Enigma, Fan and Raullen from IoTex for sharing us their use cases. we also appreciate the valuable input for designing an EIP from distinguished community members including: @frozeman, @fulldecent, @bingen, @aodhgan.

Expand Down