-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update EIP-1271: Change an
to a
in ERC 1271, as it precedes signed
#6951
Conversation
Change `an` to `a` in ERC 1271, as it precedes `signed`. I believe this was just a typo. I also noticed the clause: > considering that an *authorized* signers providing proper signatures for a given data would see their signature as "valid" by the signing contract And think "signers" may be a typo, or I may just be misinterpreting the sentence.
✅ All reviewers have approved. |
an
to a
in ERC 1271, as it precedes signed
an
to a
in ERC 1271, as it precedes signed
The commit 513ad56 (as a parent of 76310b7) contains errors. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is clearly a typo.
@Pandapip1 it looks like I figured it made sense to restrict this PR to just fixing the typo, but if you want me to make the changes recommended by those tools i can do so too |
The reason @eth-bot is blocking merging is because it requires more than one reviewer to make changes to final EIPs. Do not change anything else, or it will clear my approval. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...
Change `an` to `a` in ERC 1271, as it precedes `signed`. I believe this was just a typo. I also noticed the clause: > considering that an *authorized* signers providing proper signatures for a given data would see their signature as "valid" by the signing contract And think "signers" may be a typo, or I may just be misinterpreting the sentence.
Change `an` to `a` in ERC 1271, as it precedes `signed`. I believe this was just a typo. I also noticed the clause: > considering that an *authorized* signers providing proper signatures for a given data would see their signature as "valid" by the signing contract And think "signers" may be a typo, or I may just be misinterpreting the sentence.
Change `an` to `a` in ERC 1271, as it precedes `signed`. I believe this was just a typo. I also noticed the clause: > considering that an *authorized* signers providing proper signatures for a given data would see their signature as "valid" by the signing contract And think "signers" may be a typo, or I may just be misinterpreting the sentence.
Change `an` to `a` in ERC 1271, as it precedes `signed`. I believe this was just a typo. I also noticed the clause: > considering that an *authorized* signers providing proper signatures for a given data would see their signature as "valid" by the signing contract And think "signers" may be a typo, or I may just be misinterpreting the sentence.
Change `an` to `a` in ERC 1271, as it precedes `signed`. I believe this was just a typo. I also noticed the clause: > considering that an *authorized* signers providing proper signatures for a given data would see their signature as "valid" by the signing contract And think "signers" may be a typo, or I may just be misinterpreting the sentence.
Change
an
toa
in ERC 1271, as it precedessigned
. I believe this was just a typo.I also noticed the clause:
And think "signers" may be a typo, or I may just be misinterpreting the sentence.