Update EIP-7742: update the required EL headers and the gas fee mechanism #9047
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…nism cleanup cleanup cleanup cleanup cleanup fixes cleanup fee fn cleanup fee fn cleanup fee fn cleanup some more cleanup some more cleanup some more cleanup track max apply feedback for excess blob gas on parent gas usage params as in 4844 resolve typo better variable naming cleanup text bring get base fee to eip 4844 definition level as well w.r.t. header arg apply feedback clarification simplify the entire proposal cleanup cleanup apply feedback language cleanup restore previous langauge further cleanup Update EIPS/eip-7742.md Co-authored-by: Alex Stokes <r.alex.stokes@gmail.com> apply feedback rename to blobs per block
github-actions
bot
added
c-update
File
|
bkellerman
reviewed
Nov 24, 2024
This was referenced Nov 25, 2024
ralexstokes
reviewed
Nov 26, 2024
ralexstokes
reviewed
Nov 26, 2024
siladu
reviewed
Nov 26, 2024
Co-authored-by: Alex Stokes <r.alex.stokes@gmail.com>
ralexstokes
reviewed
Nov 26, 2024
ralexstokes
reviewed
Nov 26, 2024
ralexstokes
reviewed
Nov 26, 2024
ralexstokes
reviewed
Nov 26, 2024
Co-authored-by: Alex Stokes <r.alex.stokes@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alex Stokes <r.alex.stokes@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alex Stokes <r.alex.stokes@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alex Stokes <r.alex.stokes@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alex Stokes <r.alex.stokes@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alex Stokes <r.alex.stokes@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alex Stokes <r.alex.stokes@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alex Stokes <r.alex.stokes@gmail.com>
ralexstokes
reviewed
Nov 26, 2024
ralexstokes
reviewed
Nov 26, 2024
ralexstokes
reviewed
Nov 26, 2024
Co-authored-by: Alex Stokes <r.alex.stokes@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alex Stokes <r.alex.stokes@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alex Stokes <r.alex.stokes@gmail.com>
|
EDIT: Oops, got confused between the live version on eips.ethereum.org and this PR. Still think it would make more sense to do the math on the EL, but not a big deal. |
|
Decided on ACDC #146 to table this until Fusaka. Can likely close this PR. |
|
closing in favor of a combined full proposal here: #9062 |
Magkoooh
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2024
Magkoooh
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
as discussed in the devcon meeting of core devs, it was discussed to attempt a pass a simple effective solution to handle the fee mechanism as we scale target blob counts :
This PR will make sure that when we update the target, previously accumulated excess gas is already correctly scaled to a normalized target so the fees don't drop out when we scale the excess gas update fraction to keep up with the increasing target.