-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 975
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ssz: byte
type and canonical JSON mapping
#3506
Conversation
This PR introduces a new `byte` type equivalent in all aspects to `uint8` except that it has additional intent and display semantics attached. On top of this, the PR adds a canonical JSON mapping to the SSZ specification, documenting current usage of JSON in tests, API:s and simplifying future interop work between clients and adjacent specifications such as the Beacon API. The encoding is appropriate to use with YAML as well. As an important property, this mapping contains a 1:1 mapping of SSZ type to JSON encoding - this allows round-tripping any object between JSON and SSZ based on the SSZ schema and usage of the core SSZ types alone. The encoding presented in this PR is used in tests and API:s with one exception: the `ParticipationFlags` type from the Altair spec - it is recommended we switch encoding in tests and eventually the beacon API to address this irregularity, so as to avoid a proliferation "special" primitive types in the SSZ spec that only appear in particular schemas (and thus making validating general-purpose `SSZ/JSON` parsers more complex) as well as differences in encoding between fields of the same SSZ type. The PR also clarifies that the introduction of new aliases does not lead to changes in their canonical JSON specification - this allows building general SSZ/JSON libraries that do not further depend on open-ended knowledge about aliases. This PR should be seen as an alternative to ethereum#2983.
ssz/simple-serialize.md
Outdated
Integers are encoded as strings to avoid loss of precision in 64-bit values. | ||
|
||
Aliases are encoded as their underlying type. | ||
|
||
`hex-byte-string` is a `0x`-prefixed hex encoding of byte data, as it would appear in an SSZ stream. | ||
|
||
`List` and `Vector` of `byte` (and aliases thereof) are encoded as `hex-byte-string`. `Bitlist` and `Bitvector` similarly map their SSZ-byte encodings to a `hex-byte-string`. | ||
|
||
`Union` is encoded as an object with a `selector` and `data` field, where the contents of `data` change according to the selector. | ||
|
||
> This encoding is used in [beacon-APIs](https://github.com/ethereum/beacon-APIs) with one exception: the `ParticipationFlags` type for the `getStateV2` response, although it is an alias of `uint8`, is encoded as a list of numbers. Future versions of the beacon API may address this incompatibility. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was it not previously agreed to encode uint8
, uint16
, uint32
as numbers (because they fit in the JS size), and only encode uint64
as string? I believe that's why ParticipationFlags
is the way it is.
AFAIK the specs do not encode uint8
, uint16
, uint32
anywhere else, so changing it wouldn't be too difficult, but I still prefer to avoid unnecessary number stringification.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was it not previously agreed to encode uint8, uint16, uint32 as numbers
no idea and no strong opinion either way.
AFAIK the specs do not encode uint8
https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/blob/dev/specs/deneb/beacon-chain.md#blob is the only (other) offender I can find that potentially also should be byte-ified.
I believe that's why ParticipationFlags is the way it is.
I'd pin it on lack of interest since the two types were the same in this repo ;) ie the python code liberally uses uint8
where byte
is intended for simplicity since the two are after all... the same. Flags are not numbers in most CS-inspired interpretations of numbers that I can think of so byte
it becomes. We'll have to deal with the fallout at some point maybe, but this way we start with a clean slate at spec level.
No, all integers are meant to be encoded as quoted decimal values. I'm fine with the change, except retrospectively altering the spec which will have downstream effects and I don't see bringing any value. |
It's very useful to have a canonical representation of SSZ as JSON/YAML. All spec tests render participation flags as byte strings, so naming adjustment aligns with current usage. |
I don't see this in values within the consensus spec tests repo, for example:
And querying |
This can be done separately in the future, if wanted
f8c173c
to
66082e3
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No fundamental opposition from be, barring any significant downstream affects in tools, apis, etc.
PR's content just document existing practices so should not cause any practical change |
This exactly. I don't have a strong objection with the assumption its not going to need a ton of downstream changes. |
To further motivate this PR
|
to be merged after ACDC 2024/1/11 |
This PR introduces a new
byte
type equivalent in all aspects touint8
except that it has additional intent and display semantics attached.On top of this, the PR adds a canonical JSON mapping to the SSZ specification, documenting current usage of JSON in tests, API:s and simplifying future interop work between clients and adjacent specifications such as the Beacon API. The encoding is appropriate to use with YAML as well.
As an important property, this mapping contains a 1:1 mapping of SSZ type to JSON encoding - this allows round-tripping any object between JSON and SSZ based on the SSZ schema and usage of the core SSZ types alone.
The encoding presented in this PR is used in tests and API:s with one exception: theParticipationFlags
type from the Altair spec - it is recommended we switch encoding in tests and eventually the beacon API to address this irregularity, so as to avoid a proliferation "special" primitive types in the SSZ spec that only appear in particular schemas (and thus making validating general-purposeSSZ/JSON
parsers more complex) as well as differences in encoding between fields of the same SSZ type.Edit: the change in encoding has been removed from this PR (could be done separately down the line if desired)
The PR also clarifies that the introduction of new aliases does not lead to changes in their canonical JSON specification - this allows building general SSZ/JSON libraries that do not further depend on open-ended knowledge about aliases.
This PR should be seen as an alternative to
#2983.