remove erc-223 as it is in draft

[corwintines]

Description

• Remove ERC-223 page as it is in draft
• The page getting added has been promoted a bit dishonestly https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/15cbwoe/erc223_is_added_to_token_standards_documentation/ so another reason to remove

[gatsby-cloud]

✅ ethereum-org-website-dev deploy preview ready

• Deploy preview
• Build logs · 40m build time

[Dexaran]

Remove ERC-223 page as it is in draft

ERC-4337 is being promoted by Ethereum Foundation, even though it is still in draft. Do you have double standards?

ERC-4337 can be promoted in "draft" and ERC-223 can't be promoted because its in "draft"?

[Dexaran]

The page getting added has been promoted a bit dishonestly

Trying to solve a problem of ERC-20 that caused people to lose a lot of money (a lot = $1,1B in 5% contracts) dishonest?

Or am I stating something that is not true? Do you want to say ERC-20 is a secure standard regardless of this and this and this?

And yea, I have gone to reddit and announced that the standard was listed on the official web page - is it something dishonest and wrong? Are we obligated to keep new EIP submissions in secret from redditors or what?

[Dexaran]

Following my announcement at reddit of the standard being added to the documentation the Cryptonomist published this article.

Publishing articles and spreading the word about the standard is an important part of championing a new standard/proposal. How would it get support if it can't get announced?

And how does Ethereum make Cryptonomist look if you can add a standard to the documentation and then remove it just because "a guy from reddit complained in your discord"?

And how does Ethereum itself looks if it can add and a few days later remove a standard (with no good reasons behind it other than a request from a random redditor)?

For some unknown reason it took you 2 hours to remove a standard from the documentation but it is 5 days and it can't get added back.