Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Constantinople #1246

Merged
merged 26 commits into from
Dec 26, 2018
Merged

Constantinople #1246

merged 26 commits into from
Dec 26, 2018

Conversation

zilm13
Copy link
Collaborator

@zilm13 zilm13 commented Dec 24, 2018

Ready to schedule Constantinople fork on MainNet:

  • Tck tests commit bumped to the latest one, all failed tests fixed
  • added and passed all existing Tck tests related to Constantinople
  • MainNet config updated to enable Constantinople according to EIP-1013

Review me!

@zilm13 zilm13 requested a review from mkalinin December 24, 2018 17:31
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 24, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 57.038% when pulling 444e8dc on constantinople into 602ca25 on develop.

Copy link
Contributor

@mkalinin mkalinin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zilm13 great job! 👍

Repository originalRepo = track;
// removes address in main track copy if the same address already exists
// TCK test case only - normally this is near-impossible situation in the real network
if (cacheTrack.hasContractDetails(newContractAddress)) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't this call always return true?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And could you please share more details about the case which this workaround is made for?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@zilm13 zilm13 Dec 26, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't this call always return true?

Looks like you are right from the implementation.
But as we have such interface method for checking and as implementations could change in future, I'd keep this.

@zilm13 zilm13 merged commit b7d13a2 into develop Dec 26, 2018
@zilm13 zilm13 deleted the constantinople branch December 26, 2018 08:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants