Add RLP encoding implementation to evmone::state library #463
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #463 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.60% 99.60%
=======================================
Files 39 39
Lines 4593 4593
=======================================
Hits 4575 4575
Misses 18 18
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should consider adding/reviewing test cases from
- https://github.com/ethereum/tests/tree/develop/RLPTests
- https://github.com/ethereumjs/ethereumjs-monorepo/tree/master/packages/rlp/test
- https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/tree/master/rlp
I know projects which found bugs after adding all these, as each of them are not comprehensive. (Should try to merge all these tests.)
| @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@ | |||
| // evmone: Fast Ethereum Virtual Machine implementation | |||
| // Copyright 2021 The evmone Authors. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I started this last year :(
| namespace evmone::rlp | ||
| { | ||
| using bytes = std::basic_string<uint8_t>; | ||
| using bytes_view = std::basic_string_view<uint8_t>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Weren't these defined somewhere? Or only in Fizzy?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is already defined in multiple places (2x in EVMC). But as long as the definition is the same this is fine. Notice this RLP implementation does not include any evmone/evmc headers. Also intx include can be easily dropped.
I think I can easily manually port "official" and geth tests. |
chfast
force-pushed
the
state_rlp
branch
3 times, most recently
from
2dc2339 to
a5dde60
Compare
chfast
force-pushed
the
state_rlp
branch
2 times, most recently
from
7b1099c to
db90da9
Compare
test/unittests/state_rlp_test.cpp
Outdated
| TEST(state_rlp, encode_mpt_node) | ||
| { | ||
| const bytes path{0x20, 0x41}; | ||
| const bytes value{'v', '_', '_', '_', '_', '_', '_', '_', '_', '_', '_', '_', '_', '_', '_', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
what are these chars? maybe better represent them in hex?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is just a test case evolved...
No description provided.