Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

t8n: Add tx hash calculation for tx receipt #590

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 22, 2023
Merged

Conversation

rodiazet
Copy link
Collaborator

@rodiazet rodiazet commented Mar 21, 2023

  • Change is required by execution-spec-tests. The tool doesn't set hash field for transaction in txs.json. We have to calculate it.
  • Add better error printing to console.

@rodiazet rodiazet requested a review from chfast March 21, 2023 15:58
test/t8n/t8n.cpp Show resolved Hide resolved
test/t8n/t8n.cpp Show resolved Hide resolved
test/t8n/t8n.cpp Show resolved Hide resolved
test/t8n/t8n.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@axic axic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me otherwise.

test/t8n/t8n.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/t8n/t8n.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@axic axic changed the title Add tx hash calculation for tx receipt t8n: Add tx hash calculation for tx receipt Mar 22, 2023
@rodiazet rodiazet requested a review from chfast March 22, 2023 11:48
test/t8n/t8n.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/t8n/t8n.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/t8n/t8n.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/t8n/t8n.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@rodiazet rodiazet merged commit 61ce7c6 into master Mar 22, 2023
@rodiazet rodiazet deleted the t8n-improvement branch March 22, 2023 16:27
if (loaded_tx_hash_opt != computed_tx_hash)
throw std::logic_error("transaction hash mismatched: computed " +
hex0x(computed_tx_hash) + ", expected " +
hex0x(loaded_tx_hash_opt.value()));
Copy link
Member

@axic axic Mar 22, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could have used this here, no?

Suggested change
hex0x(loaded_tx_hash_opt.value()));
hex0x(*loaded_tx_hash_opt));

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@rodiazet rodiazet Mar 22, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Merged. I will add new PR if necessary

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants