Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consensus-layer Call 113 #823

Closed
djrtwo opened this issue Jul 5, 2023 · 8 comments
Closed

Consensus-layer Call 113 #823

djrtwo opened this issue Jul 5, 2023 · 8 comments

Comments

@djrtwo
Copy link
Collaborator

djrtwo commented Jul 5, 2023

Consensus-layer Call 113 Agenda

prev: call 112

Meeting Date/Time: Thursday 2023/7/13 at 14:00 UTC
Meeting Duration: 1.5 hours
youtube stream

  1. Deneb
    • any testnet, testing, or development updates/discussion
    • Continuation of p2p discussion
      • flood-publish changes seem to be on the critical path (disabling, just flooding to mesh, and/or staggered sending)
      • quick update from teams on strategies/timelines
  2. E-star upgrade
  3. Research, spec, etc
  4. Open Discussion/Closing Remarks
@abcoathup
Copy link

abcoathup commented Jul 6, 2023

Can we get a name for the e-star name upgrade?

The previous ACDC call discussed EIP7002 (EL triggerable exits) as a potential candidate for inclusion in the e-star name upgrade.
Week in Ethereum News: https://weekinethereumnews.com/week-in-ethereum-news-july-1-2023/
Christine Kim: https://www.galaxy.com/research/insights/ethereum-all-core-developers-consensus-call-112/

It would be easier for the community to refer to the upgrade by name rather than e-star name. The combined EL+CL upgrade name Prague + e-star could be decided and put into use.

Suggested e-star names:

Electra was popular, Danny liked Enif:
https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/e-star-name-for-consensus-layer-upgrade-after-deneb/13248
Evan suggested Errai:
https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/tackling-the-hard-problems-in-ethereum-what-to-name-the-cl-fork-after-deneb/14930

@non-fungible-nelson
Copy link

non-fungible-nelson commented Jul 11, 2023

Looking to add an agenda item for creating a new repo/standard for remote signing.

The Web3Signer team is looking to work with the community to standardize remote signing APIs in a new repo under github.com/ethereum. We have begun some work to clean up our base APIs to serve as the foundation. We are already working with other client teams and wanted to formalize on ACDC before proceeding with comment/feedback period.

@dapplion
Copy link
Contributor

@ralexstokes
Copy link
Member

fwiw, ppl on the call really liked electra for the next star name

@abcoathup
Copy link

abcoathup commented Jul 13, 2023

fwiw, ppl on the call really liked electra for the next star name

Next CL upgrade named Electra on call: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBVIGBrKaFA&t=620s

@EvanVanNessEth
Copy link
Contributor

Is it me or is the portmanteau really bad with Electra?

@holgerd77
Copy link

@EvanVanNessEth the - ah - what ?? 😋

@abcoathup
Copy link

abcoathup commented Jul 14, 2023

@EvanVanNessEth the - ah - what ?? 😋

A single name to cover both the EL + CL upgrade
Prague + Electra = Pectra or Electrague or something else

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants