-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 325
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consensus-layer Call 113 #823
Comments
Can we get a name for the e-star name upgrade? The previous ACDC call discussed EIP7002 (EL triggerable exits) as a potential candidate for inclusion in the e-star name upgrade. It would be easier for the community to refer to the upgrade by name rather than e-star name. The combined EL+CL upgrade name Prague + e-star could be decided and put into use. Suggested e-star names:Electra was popular, Danny liked Enif: |
Looking to add an agenda item for creating a new repo/standard for remote signing. The Web3Signer team is looking to work with the community to standardize remote signing APIs in a new repo under github.com/ethereum. We have begun some work to clean up our base APIs to serve as the foundation. We are already working with other client teams and wanted to formalize on ACDC before proceeding with comment/feedback period. |
|
fwiw, ppl on the call really liked electra for the next star name |
Next CL upgrade named Electra on call: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBVIGBrKaFA&t=620s |
Is it me or is the portmanteau really bad with Electra? |
@EvanVanNessEth the - ah - what ?? 😋 |
A single name to cover both the EL + CL upgrade |
Consensus-layer Call 113 Agenda
prev: call 112
Meeting Date/Time: Thursday 2023/7/13 at 14:00 UTC
Meeting Duration: 1.5 hours
youtube stream
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: