Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Execution Layer Meeting 180 #943

Closed
timbeiko opened this issue Jan 18, 2024 · 13 comments
Closed

Execution Layer Meeting 180 #943

timbeiko opened this issue Jan 18, 2024 · 13 comments

Comments

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator

timbeiko commented Jan 18, 2024

Meeting Info

Agenda

@KolbyML
Copy link
Member

KolbyML commented Jan 25, 2024

Here is a Ethereum Portal History Network 4444's FAQ https://notes.ethereum.org/@Kolby-ML/HJ-9D5aYp

@yoavw
Copy link

yoavw commented Jan 25, 2024

In the context of last call's batching discussion, it would be great if @Amxx could present EIP-5806 as a safe alternative to EIP-3074.

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@KolbyML do you want to come on the call to present it? @yoavw, I can add 5806 after the 3 big EIPs, but we may run out of time. Happy to try and slot it in, but if the call time is not great for you, it's probably safer to aim for the call after to be sure we can cover it.

@KolbyML
Copy link
Member

KolbyML commented Jan 25, 2024

@timbeiko I would be happy to!

@ethDreamer
Copy link

It would be great to discuss this PR to execution-apis on the call so that we can get significantly better data on execution layer client diversity. There appears to be widespread support but I'd like to bring a wider awareness.

@chfast
Copy link
Member

chfast commented Jan 29, 2024

Let's discuss the review/acceptance of EIP-7523 by @petertdavies.

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ethDreamer @chfast added both to the tail end of the agenda. Hopefully we get time to discuss, but worst case we can at least highlight both and get people to discuss/review async.

@CarlBeek
Copy link

I realize the agenda is already very full, but if we have the chance, it'd be great to get a final ACK on EIP-7587 - Reserve Precompile Address Range for RIPs so we can move it to Last Call

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

timbeiko commented Feb 1, 2024

@CarlBeek added it --- let's see if we can slot it in!

@charles-cooper
Copy link

i'd like to advocate again for EIP-5920 PAY opcode, as well as transient storage pricing reduction ethereum/EIPs#8158

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

timbeiko commented Feb 1, 2024

@charles-cooper I think it's probably better to push discussion around smaller EIPs to the next ACDE, as we'll have a lot to cover with the "big" ones today.

@LukaszRozmej
Copy link

After blob spamming devnet 12 became unstable: https://dora.dencun-devnet-12.ethpandaops.io/
We would like to discuss/coordinate the needed investigation before spamming goerli.
obraz

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

timbeiko commented Feb 2, 2024

Closed in favor of #952

@timbeiko timbeiko closed this as completed Feb 2, 2024
Aleneth added a commit to Aleneth/pm that referenced this issue Feb 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants