Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Execution Layer Meeting 182 #961

Closed
timbeiko opened this issue Feb 15, 2024 · 11 comments
Closed

Execution Layer Meeting 182 #961

timbeiko opened this issue Feb 15, 2024 · 11 comments

Comments

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator

timbeiko commented Feb 15, 2024

Meeting Info

Agenda

@mkalinin
Copy link
Contributor

If there is a time I’d like to quickly discuss potential Engine/JSON-RPC API change related to the block confirmation rule:

  • propagate confirmedBlockHash alongside to safeBlockHash in the engine_forkchoiceUpdated call
  • add “confirmed” block tag to JSON-RPC

Discussion points:

  • should confirmed block be propagated to and exposed by EL client. Alternatively, its hash could be obtained from CL client and then all EL data can be queried with that hash
  • should confirmed block be configurable in EL client, i.e. a node operator can alias confirmed to justified or finalized or confirmed
  • should we introduce justified block tag and preserve safe as an alias to the justified

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Added @mkalinin 👍

@djrtwo
Copy link
Collaborator

djrtwo commented Feb 28, 2024

Toni wants to go over EIP-7623 this week

@lightclient
Copy link
Member

I'd like to discuss EIP-7639: Cease serving history before PoS

@abcoathup
Copy link

@djrtwo if possible can you please include the call chat in the recording to YouTube?
Tim normally does this for ACDE. Without the chat a lot of discussion is lost, especially if people are only responding to you on the chat.

Unfortunately ACD call times are incompatible with life in Australia so can't be there live.

@nerolation
Copy link

I've quickly summarized "EIP-7623: Increasing Calldata Cost" in this doc:
https://notes.ethereum.org/@CltIPunwRmGbVfrXp0YZQg/BJRooVJ2p

@philknows
Copy link

I won’t be able to make this call, but just a quick shoutout about the light clients breakout call would be great! We will discuss Etan’s proposals and future needs of this part of the ecosystem.

@asanso
Copy link

asanso commented Feb 29, 2024

any chance to touch on https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2537 ?

@djrtwo
Copy link
Collaborator

djrtwo commented Feb 29, 2024

@asanso EIP 2537 is currently "Included" in the Pectra meta EIP -- https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7600

Happy to discuss anything else you want though

@charles-cooper
Copy link

if EIPs for prague CFI are being discussed again, i'd like to see if there is any progress on consensus for EIPS 5920 (PAY) and 7609 (transient storage pricing), as there was some discussion last ACDE but no conclusion was reached.

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

timbeiko commented Mar 4, 2024

Closed in favor of #976 --- thanks for hosting @djrtwo!

@timbeiko timbeiko closed this as completed Mar 4, 2024
Aleneth added a commit to Aleneth/pm that referenced this issue Mar 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants