Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BlockHasher: Do not hash literal kind #15231

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 1, 2024

Conversation

clonker
Copy link
Member

@clonker clonker commented Jul 1, 2024

No description provided.

@clonker clonker force-pushed the no_literal_kind_in_block_hash branch from 1a9e840 to 0333a55 Compare July 1, 2024 08:17
@clonker clonker marked this pull request as ready for review July 1, 2024 08:52
ekpyron
ekpyron previously approved these changes Jul 1, 2024
Copy link
Member

@ekpyron ekpyron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm approving this - though technically, we could even give it a changelog entry - it does in fact affect some cases, we could say something like the optimizer treating some literals that are identical, but weren't recognized as identical as identical in Yul or so (ideally phrased more concisely)

@clonker clonker force-pushed the no_literal_kind_in_block_hash branch from 0333a55 to ce02133 Compare July 1, 2024 16:47
@clonker
Copy link
Member Author

clonker commented Jul 1, 2024

I'm approving this - though technically, we could even give it a changelog entry - it does in fact affect some cases, we could say something like the optimizer treating some literals that are identical, but weren't recognized as identical as identical in Yul or so (ideally phrased more concisely)

added a changelog entry in the spirit of what you proposed

@clonker clonker merged commit abf88cd into ethereum:develop Jul 1, 2024
72 checks passed
@clonker clonker deleted the no_literal_kind_in_block_hash branch July 1, 2024 17:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants