EIPP86: not zero, but the NULL_SENDER address

Paper.tex

@@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ \subsection{Execution}
 \begin{equation} \label{eq:address_calc}
 a \equiv \mathcal{B}_{96..255}\Big(\mathtt{\tiny KEC}\big(\zeta \cdot \mathtt{\tiny KEC}(\mathbf{i})\big)\Big)
 \end{equation}
-where $\zeta$ denotes the zero element of $\mathbb{B}_{160}$, the operator $\cdot$ is the concatenation of binary data, $\mathtt{\tiny KEC}$ is the Keccak 256-bit hash function, $\mathcal{B}_{a..b}(X)$ evaluates to binary value containing the bits of indices in the range $[a, b]$ of the binary data.
+where $\zeta$ denotes $2^{160}-1$ in $\mathbb{B}_{160}$, the operator $\cdot$ is the concatenation of binary data, $\mathtt{\tiny KEC}$ is the Keccak 256-bit hash function, $\mathcal{B}_{a..b}(X)$ evaluates to binary value containing the bits of indices in the range $[a, b]$ of the binary data.
 
 Note we use $\Theta_{3}$ to denote the fact that only the first three components of the function's value are taken; the final represents the message-call's output value (a byte array) and is unused in the context of transaction evaluation.