invalid value for value.type

[zemse]

Ethers Beta Version

6.0.0-beta-exports.4

Describe the Problem

Ganache's eth_getTransactionReceipt does not include tx.type. Hence waiting for a tx gives an error. If tx.type is not present, it is likely that it's an old infra and tx.type can be taken as 0 implicitly.

Here is the rpc response:

{
  id: 17,
  jsonrpc: '2.0',
  result: {
    transactionHash: '0x3ed44b5b94bbff1c1a5463b41c79a0b8709af10e72c606e955a1b50dc2e4958c',
    transactionIndex: '0x0',
    blockHash: '0x614760a60117471a61e2b6132f1e81f88bc43dac917d1b2eb8ef9267bd54ec0d',
    blockNumber: '0x2',
    from: '0xaa45a60f5a98b6859a7cbf057d27766347263216',
    to: '0x88ef4f3291fb068bc0b813d3b0d1461af901c14d',
    gasUsed: '0x81d4',
    cumulativeGasUsed: '0x81d4',
    contractAddress: null,
    logs: [ [Object] ],
    status: '0x1',
    logsBloom: '0x00000000000000000000000000000000001000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000100000000000000000000000200000100000000000200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000008000000000000000000000000000000000004000000000000000000000000000000000010000000000000000000000000000000000008000000000000000000000000000000'
  }
}

Code Snippet

const tx = await simpleStorageInstance.setValue("hi");
await tx.wait();

Errors

Error: invalid value for value.type (invalid numeric value (argument="value", value=undefined, code=INVALID_ARGUMENT, version=6.0.0-beta-exports.4)) (value={"transactionHash":"0x3ed44b5b94bbff1c1a5463b41c79a0b8709af10e72c606e955a1b50dc2e4958c","transactionIndex":"0x0","blockHash":"0x614760a60117471a61e2b6132f1e81f88bc43dac917d1b2eb8ef9267bd54ec0d","blockNumber":"0x2","from":"0xaa45a60f5a98b6859a7cbf057d27766347263216","to":"0x88ef4f3291fb068bc0b813d3b0d1461af901c14d","gasUsed":"0x81d4","cumulativeGasUsed":"0x81d4","contractAddress":null,"logs":[{"logIndex":"0x0","transactionIndex":"0x0","transactionHash":"0x3ed44b5b94bbff1c1a5463b41c79a0b8709af10e72c606e955a1b50dc2e4958c","blockHash":"0x614760a60117471a61e2b6132f1e81f88bc43dac917d1b2eb8ef9267bd54ec0d","blockNumber":"0x2","address":"0x88ef4f3291fb068bc0b813d3b0d1461af901c14d","data":"0x00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000400000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000080000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000b68656c6c6f20776f726c6400000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000026869000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","topics":["0xe826f71647b8486f2bae59832124c70792fba044036720a54ec8dacdd5df4fcb","0x000000000000000000000000aa45a60f5a98b6859a7cbf057d27766347263216"],"type":"mined","removed":false}],"status":"0x1","logsBloom":"0x00000000000000000000000000000000001000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000100000000000000000000000200000100000000000200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000008000000000000000000000000000000000004000000000000000000000000000000000010000000000000000000000000000000000008000000000000000000000000000000","effectiveGasPrice":"0x77359400"}, code=BAD_DATA, version=6.0.0-beta-exports.4)

Environment

Ganache

Environment (Other)

No response

[pustovalov]

I also encountered this error in version 6.0.0-beta-exports.11

[pustovalov]

Issue exists in 6.0.2, is this expected behaviour?

[albertov19]

I can confirm that exists on 6.0.2 when running a client (of Moonbeam) that used to not have the tx type included in the receipt:

{
    "jsonrpc": "2.0",
    "result": {
        "blockHash": "0x8edcba7af40852ad3056aa0b4dbd8647febe4d8eb487fc669f7d6167d9d9f0f3",
        "blockNumber": "0x1",
        "contractAddress": "0xc2bf5f29a4384b1ab0c063e1c666f02121b6084a",
        "cumulativeGasUsed": "0x7058f",
        "effectiveGasPrice": "0xd09dc300",
        "from": "0x6be02d1d3665660d22ff9624b7be0551ee1ac91b",
        "gasUsed": "0x7058f",
        "logs": [],
        "logsBloom": "0x00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
        "status": "0x1",
        "to": null,
        "transactionHash": "0xc74d3c2b424119e37e207cc08a6e901746cfc9c239f3876d767a397649d5f6eb",
        "transactionIndex": "0x0"
    },
    "id": 1
}

[ricmoo]

I’ll get this in the next patch release.

[ricmoo]

This should be fixed now. Let me know if you still have any problems.

Thanks! :)

[albertov19]

I tested the previous scenario that was failing in 6.0.2 and it is working as expected on 6.0.3 😃 thanks for the quick turnaround!

[wanglonghong]

I tested the previous scenario that was failing in 6.0.2 and it is working as expected on 6.0.3 😃 thanks for the quick turnaround!
I had the same case, failing in 6.0.2 but working in 6.0.3. Nice fix!

[ricmoo]

Awesome!

Thanks! :)