Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EthStorage Devs Meeting #72 Agenda #77

Closed
qzhodl opened this issue Mar 19, 2024 · 9 comments
Closed

EthStorage Devs Meeting #72 Agenda #77

qzhodl opened this issue Mar 19, 2024 · 9 comments

Comments

@qzhodl
Copy link
Contributor

qzhodl commented Mar 19, 2024

Meeting Info

  • Mar 19, 2023, 11:00 UTC+8
  • Duration: 60 minutes
  • Meeting link
  • Anyone can comment on the agenda where they would like this to be discussed.

Agenda

  • Protocol/App/Research progress
@qzhodl
Copy link
Contributor Author

qzhodl commented Mar 19, 2024

  • Public testnet progress track

@iteyelmp
Copy link

  1. Create Awesome-web3 github public repo.
  2. ethfs-cli bug fix
  3. ethstorage-sdk supports browser via wasm
  4. Audit form data running es-node

@iteyelmp iteyelmp reopened this Mar 19, 2024
@ping-ke
Copy link

ping-ke commented Mar 19, 2024

EthStorage -- sync

@blockchaindevsh
Copy link
Contributor

blockchaindevsh commented Mar 19, 2024

  1. created 4 prs for SoulETH and PrevRanDAO: 3(PrevRanDao and SoulETH and ES) for optimism, 1 for op-geth
  2. discuss with qi about supporting storing L1 blobs from L2 by referring to history L1 blockhash from L1Block contract
  3. outlined the work required to support L2 blobs
  4. Polished previous article about ecotone upgrade with concrete examples.
  5. Now researching op e2e test.

@dajuguan
Copy link
Contributor

@LiuJiazheng
Copy link
Contributor

@qzhodl
Copy link
Contributor Author

qzhodl commented Mar 19, 2024

Please feel free to ask me for the recording link if you'd like to review the meeting.

@qzhodl qzhodl closed this as completed Mar 19, 2024
@Joss-Hua
Copy link

EthStorage -- sync

Is there "twitter user has larger than 100 followers" in the rules, why is it one of the requirements?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants