include fides_key in datamap api output

[SteveDMurphy]

Closes #987

Code Changes

• Include the fides_key for system and dataset rows returned by the /datamap enpoint

Steps to Confirm

• Validate the fides_key of items in the data map
• Work with frontend to ensure it works for them

Pre-Merge Checklist

• All CI Pipelines Succeeded
• Documentation Updated:
  • documentation complete, or draft/outline provided (tag docs-team to complete/review on this branch)
  • documentation issue created (tag docs-team to complete issue separately)
• Issue Requirements are Met
• Relevant Follow-Up Issues Created
• Update CHANGELOG.md

Description Of Changes

This is not pretty but wanted to get a start out for this quickly as it sounds like a potential blocking item

[LKCSmith]

@SteveDMurphy I really appreciate you getting started on this, despite feeling under the weather, and I hope you are feeling better or at least taking the time to feel better!! 🍵 Let me know when you think this is good for the FE to test with.

[SteveDMurphy]

@SteveDMurphy I really appreciate you getting started on this, despite feeling under the weather, and I hope you are feeling better or at least taking the time to feel better!! 🍵 Let me know when you think this is good for the FE to test with.

Thanks @LKCSmith !! This at least has the fides key(s) for system and dataset included, so that may be enough to start. I am going to experiment with pulling in the system dependencies as well this morning but hoping you can get an early start

[SteveDMurphy]

@LKCSmith both fides_key's and system_dependencies are now part of the output. I think the output is still technically a comma separated string but I think that should be easily fixed (Assuming it's easier for the frontend to have a list instead of a string) - would love to hear what you get from any testing!

[LKCSmith]

@SteveDMurphy Thank you! I'll try this out today 🚀

[LKCSmith]

@SteveDMurphy - One last request (if it makes sense to you) - is it possible to also include the system.description? If I had this included, I wouldn't need to map through an additional query to link it in the spatial map node. If it doesn't make sense to return it here, then I can do that mapping, but thought this might be more straightforward. What do you think?

[SteveDMurphy]

@SteveDMurphy - One last request (if it makes sense to you) - is it possible to also include the system.description? If I had this included, I wouldn't need to map through an additional query to link it in the spatial map node. If it doesn't make sense to return it here, then I can do that mapping, but thought this might be more straightforward. What do you think?

Thanks for the heads up @LKCSmith ! I don't see any issue with including it as well, anything to we can do to make rendering the datamap a bit easier 👍🏽. The only problem I foresee is if there are a large number of rows for a single system (thinking many data categories) we end up duplicating a bunch of data unnecessarily for each row. I think this is likely a problem we can address down the road however and just focus on driving ahead here.

Will get that added either later tonight or first thing in the morning so you can drop that additional query, thanks again!

[ThomasLaPiana]

LGTM! Thanks for the speedy unblocking action here :)

[SteveDMurphy]

Thanks for the lightning fast review!! ⚡ ⚡