-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I18n en translations reference #425
I18n en translations reference #425
Conversation
Could you rebase onto main without my commits? Should keep things a little tidier, especially as you're touching a section of the documentation that I haven't. |
Just removed them. Somehow the diff to main affects some files I didn't touch. Can investigate again later if necessary. |
aaef6e5
to
54374d3
Compare
That's reference finished, I think. Please take a look! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM pending comment on the previous stuff
allows us to calculate at any point in time the surplus power. Measuring the | ||
generated power is interesting, but has no effect on the function, with the | ||
this exception: | ||
https://docs.evcc.io/docs/guides/meters#ich-habe-eine-pv-anlage-aber-keinen-netzanschluss-z%C3%A4hler-kann-ich-evcc-trotzdem-nutzen |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this be a link to the EN documentation?
|
||
The minimum power required to charge is calculated from the values `minCurrent` | ||
and `phases`, defined per `loadpoint` (a group of colocated chargers) | ||
See https://docs.evcc.io/docs/reference/configuration/loadpoints for more |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same here (and in other places)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this should definitly be a relative link like this:
See https://docs.evcc.io/docs/reference/configuration/loadpoints for more | |
See [`loadpoints`](./loadpoints) |
evcc requires a configuration file in which the system is described. Without | ||
this file, evcc cannot be used. The file itself is written in | ||
[YAML](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YAML). This format defines a syntax with | ||
which data can be structured in plain text. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could this be rephrased to something that flows a little more naturally? I feel like this might be a bit too direct a translation from DE.
Looks very nice! Do you have anything beside the linking comments open? Otherwise I would merge this. |
@carygravel Any idea what state this is in at the moment? Could just merge this and then tackle the links in a separate issue |
@carygravel As suggested by @duckfullstop, I'll merge this now and we can update in smaller increments from there. |
Apologies for the lack of response. Things are a little fraught at the moment. I'll fix the comments ASAP. |
This is still a work in progress. Just wanted to be transparent about how far I had got. Note that I started with @duckfullstop 's branch. If his commits are a problem, I can rebase/remove them.