[Fix] Job Proposal Plugin #8656
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@rahul-rocket has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 36 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces comprehensive changes to the job proposal plugin, focusing on enhancing documentation, adding new properties to entities, and updating repository and module configurations. The changes include improvements to ESLint configurations, entity documentation, repository support for MikroORM, and the addition of new properties to the Proposal entity. The modifications aim to improve code clarity, type safety, and overall plugin functionality. Changes
Suggested reviewers
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/proposal-template/employee-proposal-template.module.ts (1)
20-20: Encourage additional provider testingConsider adding or updating tests to verify that both repository providers function properly. For example, confirm that your module can inject these repositories without collision in an end-to-end test scenario.
packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/proposal-template/employee-proposal-template.entity.ts (1)
59-62: EmployeeId relation IDIndicating the source of
employeeIdclearly helps future maintainers. Consider adding a robust test to ensureemployeeIdis always populated in relevant queries.packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/proposal-template/employee-proposal-template.service.ts (1)
28-29: Suggestion: Handle concurrency carefully.
If multiple requests callmakeDefaultconcurrently, consider using transactions or locking to avoid race conditions when togglingisDefault.packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/proposal/proposal.entity.ts (1)
49-52:proposalContentusage mirrorsjobPostContent.
Likewise, verify if this field should be typed as non-optional.packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/proposal-template/employee-proposal-template.controller.ts (1)
29-57: Comprehensive pagination documentation.The added JSDoc and Swagger decorators for pagination (skip/take) effectively clarify the parameters and return value. It helps the consumers of this API know precisely how to configure pagination. If possible, consider adding an example usage in the description to guide newcomers.
packages/plugins/job-proposal/tsconfig.json (1)
8-9: Revisit disabling strict index signature checks.Disabling
noPropertyAccessFromIndexSignaturemay mask potential type errors when accessing properties on objects with index signatures. Consider leaving this rule enabled (set totrue) to detect subtle issues at compile time.- "noPropertyAccessFromIndexSignature": false + "noPropertyAccessFromIndexSignature": true
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
packages/plugins/job-proposal/.eslintrc.json(0 hunks)packages/plugins/job-proposal/eslint.config.js(1 hunks)packages/plugins/job-proposal/jest.config.ts(0 hunks)packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/job-proposal.plugin.ts(2 hunks)packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/proposal-template/employee-proposal-template.controller.ts(5 hunks)packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/proposal-template/employee-proposal-template.entity.ts(1 hunks)packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/proposal-template/employee-proposal-template.module.ts(2 hunks)packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/proposal-template/employee-proposal-template.service.ts(2 hunks)packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/proposal-template/repository/index.ts(0 hunks)packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/proposal-template/repository/type-orm-employee-proposal-template.repository.ts(1 hunks)packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/proposal/proposal.entity.ts(3 hunks)packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/proposal/proposal.module.ts(1 hunks)packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/proposal/proposal.service.ts(3 hunks)packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/proposal/repository/index.ts(0 hunks)packages/plugins/job-proposal/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
- packages/plugins/job-proposal/jest.config.ts
- packages/plugins/job-proposal/.eslintrc.json
- packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/proposal-template/repository/index.ts
- packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/proposal/repository/index.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/proposal-template/repository/type-orm-employee-proposal-template.repository.ts
🔇 Additional comments (34)
packages/plugins/job-proposal/eslint.config.js (1)
1-19: Good overall structure for consolidating ESLint configs
Your approach of extending the base .eslintrc.json configuration and then selectively adding rules for JSON files provides a neat, modular approach. Ensure the @nx/dependency-checks plugin is properly installed and configured in your dev dependencies to avoid potential runtime errors when linting. Looks good otherwise!
packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/proposal-template/employee-proposal-template.module.ts (1)
9-10: Verify compatibility of MikroORM and TypeORM repositories
It's unusual to have both MikroOrmEmployeeProposalTemplateRepository and TypeOrmEmployeeProposalTemplateRepository side by side unless you need to support multiple ORM strategies concurrently. Double-check to ensure that both repositories function as intended without conflicts and provide clear usage guidelines so that developers know which repository to inject.
packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/proposal/proposal.module.ts (2)
11-12: Confirm repository consistency across modules
As with the employee proposal template module, verify that both TypeOrmProposalRepository and MikroOrmProposalRepository do not accidentally operate on the same data with different states or schema definitions.
15-17: Explicit controllers and expanded providers
Explicitly declaring the controller array is clear. Including both repositories in the providers array can be useful for flexible database implementations. However, ensure each repository is thoroughly tested and documented so developers know when to leverage TypeORM vs. MikroORM in this module.
Also applies to: 25-31, 32-34
packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/proposal-template/employee-proposal-template.entity.ts (4)
16-20: Comprehensive inline documentation for ‘name’
Good use of JSDoc and the index annotation. This clarifies its purpose for other contributors. Keep up the documentation approach.
24-28: Nice enhancement with full-text search support
Marking content as nullable and adding full-text indexing is helpful for advanced search features. Ensure your chosen database supports this indexing or gracefully degrades otherwise.
34-37: IsDefault property documentation
Documenting default values is beneficial for clarity. Confirm the actual default in the database schema matches the code default.
49-52: Cascade delete for Employee relation
This is a valuable approach: it prevents orphaned templates. Just confirm it aligns with your domain requirements and that no critical references to the template remain upon employee deletion.
packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/proposal-template/employee-proposal-template.service.ts (7)
1-2: Imports look correct and follow NestJS best practices.
No issues spotted with importing NotFoundException and the contract types.
5-6: Repositories are split into MikroORM and TypeORM implementations.
This approach is flexible, but ensure you have sufficient test coverage to confirm both repositories behave identically.
20-22: Documentation improvements are great!
This JSDoc clarifies the method’s purpose and parameter/return types, enhancing readability.
24-27: Method signature is clear and strongly typed.
Good use of public async with typed parameters and return value.
30-32: NotFoundException usage is correct.
Good practice to throw a specific HTTP exception when the resource is not found.
34-44: Logic for toggling default templates is clear.
Reseting other templates’ isDefault to false before saving the main template is consistent with a single-default approach.
48-57: Pagination approach is straightforward.
Returning super.findAll(params) is concise and leverages built-in functionality.
packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/proposal/proposal.service.ts (5)
8-9: Import references are now explicit.
This avoids reliance on index.ts re-exports, making code navigation clearer.
27-27: Direct return of this.pagination(filter).
Prefer returning the promise directly for readability. This is clean and eliminates unnecessary await.
33-33: JSDoc comment update.
Documenting parameter types improves maintainability. Good addition.
40-40: Skip unnecessary await.
Directly returning the promise aligns with prior discussion and is consistent with the findAll approach.
72-72: Final return after filter modifications.
Logic is still clear; any modifications are applied before calling super.paginate(filter).
packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/job-proposal.plugin.ts (3)
11-18: Documentation for imports and entities is well-structured.
This helps readers understand the functionality imported and registered by the plugin.
20-28: Configuration callback is well-explained.
Adding the proposals relation to Tag is documented, which fosters easy maintainability and usage discovery.
Line range hint 30-41: Ensure appropriate migrations for newly added fields.
You may want to verify that the underlying table tag_proposal and its columns match the plugin config.
packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/proposal/proposal.entity.ts (6)
21-24: Optional jobPostUrl properly annotated.
The field’s doc and usage are consistent, clearly indicating it may be null or undefined.
31-34: Optional valueDate with good doc comments.
Nicely clarifies the meaning of valueDate and ensures clarity for consumers.
58-61: Enum usage for status is correct.
This helps ensure valid statuses while promoting type safety.
73-78: Excellent doc comments for employeeId.
Associations with Employee are well-explained, ensuring better understanding of relationships.
90-92: UUID validation is a good practice.
Ensures employeeId is correctly formatted before insert/update.
100-105: Optional relationship with OrganizationContact
The code and doc remain consistent, using @IsOptional() and @IsUUID().
packages/plugins/job-proposal/src/lib/proposal-template/employee-proposal-template.controller.ts (5)
2-2: Great use of @nestjs/swagger for clearer API documentation.
Importing ApiBody, ApiResponse, ApiOperation, ApiQuery, and ApiParam from @nestjs/swagger is a good practice to keep your endpoint specifications concise, standardized, and well-documented.
68-89: Well-structured "Make Default" endpoint documentation.
Marking a template as default is now better explained with clear parameter and response documentation. Ensure any front-end or client services are updated to handle the optional body payload.
100-128: Enhanced "Find All" endpoint.
The detailed operation summary and query parameters for pagination or filtering will help avoid confusion. Maintain consistency in query param naming (e.g., using skip and take across other endpoints) to encourage uniform usage patterns.
142-145: Clear "Create" endpoint documentation.
The required body payload (CreateProposalTemplateDTO) is documented succinctly, giving consumers enough information to construct the request. If future expansions are needed (e.g., additional fields), keep these annotations in sync to avoid mismatches.
Also applies to: 147-160, 163-165
172-176: Informative "Update" endpoint documentation.
Documenting that the method may return either an updated entity or an UpdateResult covers advanced scenarios. This ensures that callers can gracefully handle both outcomes. The code remains consistent with TypeORM patterns.
Also applies to: 178-191
|
View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit b954548.
☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at |
PR
Please note: we will close your PR without comment if you do not check the boxes above and provide ALL requested information.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
New Features
Chores
Refactor