feat: don't show when commands are skipped because of no matched files

[technicalpickles]

Closes #467

⚡ Summary

If you have lots of commands, and make small commits, you'll often see a lot of skipped commands:

sorbet: (SKIP. NO FILES FOR INSPECTION)
stylelint: (SKIP. NO FILES FOR INSPECTION)
codeowners: (SKIP. NO FILES FOR INSPECTION)
authorization: (SKIP. NO FILES FOR INSPECTION)
svgo: (SKIP. NO FILES FOR INSPECTION)
syncpack: (SKIP. NO FILES FOR INSPECTION)
eslint: (SKIP. NO FILES FOR INSPECTION)
packwerk: (SKIP. NO FILES FOR INSPECTION)
rubocop: (SKIP. NO FILES FOR INSPECTION)

I wanted a way to skip this. I'm migrating from a home grown hook runner, and it had pretty concise output that I'm trying to recreate. I was able to do that with most of the other options, but still had this output.

I apologize in advance, this is my first go contribution to anything 🤪

☑️ Checklist

• Check locally
• Add tests

[technicalpickles]

I've been looking over the repo, and found this in the troubleshooting: https://github.com/evilmartians/lefthook/wiki/Troubleshooting#skip-no-files-for-inspecting

This means that after filtering the git files, nothing remains. You can debug filtres by -v flag. Like this:

lefthook -v run pre-commit
This also happens often for fresh repositories. Just commit something.

I'm not sure if this is accurate. This is a pretty old monolith, and I see this pretty often 😅 I'm able to "fix" it by having something that matches a pattern to be committed.

[mrexox]

Thank you for contribution! This totally makes sense (although skip skip sounds funny). I have a small suggestion to refactor the code and put a skip settings check into a logSkip function.

I'd also suggest to name the skip_output setting skips, so it sounds a bit more natural (like, skip the skips) since we probably want to skip all kinds of skips logging that we have in lefthook 🙂

If you don't have time for these edits I can do it for you, but I'll wait for your response 🙌

[technicalpickles]

although skip skip sounds funny
That was kinda the appeal honestly 😂

I'd also suggest to name the skip_output setting skips,

Sure, that sounds good. I mostly did it to be consistent with the other variables. Although, unlike the others... "There are plenty places that log about skipping", so maybe that's more appropriate.

I think it's better put this code in logSkip function and make it a Runner's method in order to be able to check SkipSettings.

Can do! I considered that, but I wasn't able to see any of those locally. If you are good with it, I can make the change.

If you don't have time for these edits I can do it for you, but I'll wait for your response 🙌

I can take care of it! Thanks for the offer though.

[mrexox]

Thank you! Now everything is perfect!

[technicalpickles]

Thanks! I appreciate the feedback, merging, and release 🌈 🚀 🌟