-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 521
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
some applications bypass opensnitch like wget or #171
Comments
any log you can provide? |
<-[2m[2018-05-08 17:23:27]<-[0m <-[97m<-[104m IMP <-[0m Starting opensnitch-daemon v1.0.0b <-[2m[2018-05-08 17:39:31]<-[0m <-[97m<-[104m IMP <-[0m Got signal: terminated my than i already downloaded two files with wget |
can you attach the contents of your |
Its empty, for this test i removed all rules and rebooted, |
oh i see ... may i ask you to repeat the test with debug logging enabled ( |
sure, where do i add the -debug to? |
I noticed that when I restart the service after reboot it shows a message for get just fine. only after reboot it does not see it |
yes it's an argument for the daemon |
how do i pass a parameter to a deamon that is being started at boot? what file do i have to add the parameter to? |
change the command line on |
`�[2m[2018-05-08 17:23:27]�[0m �[97m�[104m IMP �[0m Starting opensnitch-daemon v1.0.0b �[2m[2018-05-08 17:39:31]�[0m �[97m�[104m IMP �[0m Got signal: terminated �[2m[2018-05-12 07:52:35]�[0m �[97m�[104m IMP �[0m Got signal: terminated |
"Could not find process id for" sounds to me as it may be the root of the problem after i restart the service it works fine: The issue is reproducibly only present after reboot (i remember that the first start after compile also had that issue) Cheers |
yep, there're some cases when that happens and that's pretty much the only reason why this is still not 1.0.0, i'm trying to fix that but it's not easy :) |
How about in such cases still showing the prompt (with no option to make a permanent rule) and just say unidentified application cause than the user at least would have the option to allow or deny it anyways. |
It's really bug, old version working well. But new version don't catch any application. |
same problem, i have reinstalled it today. |
Same problem, no logging or activity at all on any outgoing connection. |
Very patchy. Even for those subset of applications that work. A very large proportion of the traffic is being missed. And other applications are missed entirely. If I knew how to install the old version instead, (being on ubuntu 18.04). Then I would certainly try that. But at best, it's really complex to install for the uninitiated. Due to it's required dependencies and certain other idiosyncrasies |
@dreamcat4 remember this software is free and open source, you're welcome to send your contributions to improve it! |
Thank you for the offer @evilsocket. But that's a decline from me. For certain other reasons which I would not wish to bother you with.... It's only so annoying because you seem so close! And due to the lack of similar options in this space, why it's so important for your project to succeed. |
if it's annoying, you can help, or you can decide not to use this software ... complaining that way, without even a log one can use to debug the issues you're experiencing, doesn't change much i'm afraid. |
Hi all, I'm having this problem with chromium on Debian. What I've realized is that the simbolic link in /proc is broken:
In my case I'm runnning chromium under firejail, I don't know if it causes the "broken" symbolic link. |
One possible solution/workaround would be to Stat the file, and maybe get rid of the " (deleted)" part.
|
Hello. I am noticing the same issue and it seems to be random as far as what sneaks through. It is catching a lot of system stuff fine (gnome, networkmonitor, pacman) but most user level apps are getting through (firefox, spotify, vlc, discord). I did a reboot and it picked up Firefox but it did not pick up Spotify or Discord or any other apps. Rebooted again and it did not pick up anything. Anything I can do to help isolate the issue better? I am not a programmer but I love this software and want to be useful if there's a way for me to be so. |
We have discussed in deep detail this problem here: gustavo-iniguez-goya#84 Most of these errors should be fixed with latest packages, but we still have work to do: https://github.com/evilsocket/opensnitch/releases There's a new check ([x] Intercept unknown connections) which if you enable it a pop-up will appear when one connection can not be bind to a program. |
Some applications bypass opensnitch like wget or transmission, while for firefox it works fine.
It seams to be a major issue as ofcause no application should be able to bypass the tool
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: